期刊文献+

美国高等教育效能运动:学理基础、历史发展及基本特征 被引量:6

American Higher Education Effectiveness Movement:Theoretical Foundation,Historical Development and Basic Characteristics
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代中期,美国高等教育效能运动兴起,其学理基础是组织效能研究尤其是高等教育组织效能研究,其发展得益于问责背景下认证机构的强势推动。基本特征包括:院校使命与学生学习成果是院校效能的根本旨趣;通过认证回应社会问责是院校效能的外部导向;通过认证实现学校改进是院校效能的内部导向;资源的配置与使用是院校效能的财力保障;教师及院校研究人员的积极参与是院校效能的人力保障。高等教育效能运动源于并超越了效能研究,并体现了一种新型质量文化。 In the mid-1980s, American higher education effectiveness movement rose. Its theoretical basis is organizational effectiveness research, especially the organization effectiveness research in higher education. Its development benefited greatly from the strong promotion of accreditation in the background of accountability. Its basic characteristics include: the mission of the college and student learning outcomes are the fundamental purpose of higher education effectiveness; the allocation and use of resources is the financial guarantee of effectiveness; the response to social accountability through accreditation is the external orientation of effectiveness; college improvement is the internal orientation of effectiveness; the active participation of faculty and institutional researchers is the human resources guarantee of effectiveness. The higher education effectiveness movement stems from but transcends organizational effectiveness research, and embodies a new kind of quality culture.
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第10期40-46,共7页 China Higher Education Research
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题"院校研究的决策支持有效性及影响因素研究"(EIA140415)研究成果
关键词 组织效能 高等教育效能 学理基础 历史发展 基本特征 organizational effectiveness higher education effectiveness theoretical foundation historicaldevelopment basic characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献48

  • 1张民选.关于高等教育认证机制的研究[J].教育研究,2005,26(2):37-44. 被引量:48
  • 2约翰·布瑞兰.欧洲高等教育评估[A].谷贤林等译.国家、高等教育与市场[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2005.214-228.
  • 3唐纳德·肯尼迪.学术责任[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.24、23.
  • 4Jones, G. A. Governing Quality: Positioning Student Learning as a Core Objective of Institutional and System-Level Governance [Z]. Keynote paper presented at the International Conference on Higher Education Student Learning and Development in a Globalizing Time, Hosted by the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2013.27--28.
  • 5Schofer, E., Meyer, J. W. The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century [J].Ameriean Soeiological Review, 2005, (6).
  • 6Ramirez, F. O. The Rationalization of Universities [A]. Djelic, M-L., Sahlin-Andersson, K. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation [C]. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006.225--244.
  • 7Tight, M. Researching Higher Education [ M ]. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press, 2003.112.
  • 8Salter, B., Tapper, T. The Politics of Governance in Higher Education: the Case of Quality Assurance [J]. Political Studies, 2000, ( 1 ).
  • 9Ball, S. J. The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity [ J ]. Journal of Education Policy, 2003, (2).
  • 10Trow, M. Trust, Markets and Aaccountability in Higher Education : A Comparative Perspective [J ]. Higher Education Policy, 1996, (4).

共引文献90

同被引文献53

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部