期刊文献+

AJCC—TRG联合ypTN分期评价局部进展期直肠癌预后 被引量:2

Prognostic value of American Joint Committee on Cancer-tumor regression grading combined with ypTN staging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨AJCC-TRG分级联合ypTN分期评估局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助放化疗后的预后,并筛查预后最差的亚组人群。方法 2004—2012年间中山大学肿瘤防治中心收治LARC 263例,男176例,女87例,中位年龄55岁。所有患者接受术前新辅助放化疗,并于放疗结束后6-8周施行全直肠系膜切除术。根据第7版AJCC-TRG分级标准及ypTNM分期标准对术后组织标本重新评价。生存分析评价不同肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)联合ypTN对各项生存指标的预测情况。Kaplan-Meier法计算OS、DFS、LRFS及DMFS,Logrank法检验和单因素预后分析。结果 中位随访时间为60.1个月,全组5年OS、DFS、LRFS和DMFS分别为80.0%、75.0%、97.0%和81.0%。不同ypT/TRG、ypN/TRG组合间的OS、DFS及DMFS差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。ypT3—T4/TRG 2—3、ypN1—N2/TRG 2—3亚组预后最差,5年OS,DFS和DMFS分别为66.9%、56.0%,52.2%、41.4%和60.9%、46.0%。结论 AJCC-TRG联合ypTN分期能更准确评估LARC预后,筛查出高危远处转移预后最差亚组人群,对指导LARC个体化术后辅助治疗具有重要临床意义。 Objective To investigate the prognostic value of American Joint Committee on Cancer-tumor regression grading (AJCC-TRG) combined with ypTN stage in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC),who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy,and to identify the subgroups with the worst prognosis. Methods A total of 263 patients with LARC,including 176 males and 87 females,with a median age of 55 years,were admitted to Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2004 to 2012.All the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery and underwent total mesorectal excision at 6 to 8 weeks after radiotherapy. All the surgical specimens were reevaluated according to the AJCC (7th edition)-TRG system and ypTN staging criteria. The prognostic prediction by TRG combined with ypTN was evaluated using survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the rates of overall survival (OS),disease-free survival (DFS),local recurrence-free survival (LRFS),and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).The log-rank test was used for survival comparison and univariate prognostic analysis. Results The median follow-up was 60.1 months. The 5-year rates of OS,DFS,LRFS,and DMFS for all patients were 80.0%,75.0%,97.0%,and 81.0%,respectively. There were significant differences in OS,DFS,and DMFS between different ypT/TRG subgroups and different ypN/TRG subgroups (all P〈0.05).ypT3-4/TRG 2-3 and ypN1-2/TRG 2-3 subgroups showed the worst prognosis. The 5-year rates of OS,DFS,and DMFS of the two subgroups were 66.9%/56.0%,52.2%/41.4%,and 60.9%/46.0%,respectively. Conclusions A combination of AJCC-TRG system and ypTN staging can better predict the prognosis of LARC and identify the subgroups with the worst prognosis,which may provide a clinical guidance for postoperative individualized decision on adjuvant therapy for LARC.
作者 魏嘉旺 肖巍魏 奚少彦 常晖 王俏镟 李力人 张惠忠 曾智帆 丁培荣 高远红 Wei Jiawang Xiao Weiwei Xi Shaoyan Chang Hui Wang Qiaoxuan Li Liren Zhang Huizhong Zeng Zhifan Ding Peirong Gao Yuanhong(Department of Radiation Oncology ,Department of Pathology,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期1147-1150,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 直肠肿瘤/新辅助疗法 新辅助疗法 放射 新辅助疗法 药物 预后 Rectal neoplasms/neoadjuvant therapy Neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy Neoadjuvant therapy, drug Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Sauer R,Liersch T,Merkel S,et al.Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer:results of the german CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase Ⅲ trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.J Clin Oncol,2012,30:1926-1933.
  • 2Quah HM,Chou JF,Gonen M,et al.Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation.Cancer,2008,113:57-64.
  • 3Park I J,You YN,Agarwal A,et al.Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer.J Clin Oncol,2012,30:1770-1776.
  • 4Belluco C,De Paoli A,Canzonieri V,et al.Long-term outcome of patients with complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for cT3 rectal cancer:implications for local excision surgical strategies.Ann Surg Oncol,2011,18:3686-3693.
  • 5Govindarajan A,Reidy D,Weiser MR,et al.Recurrence rates and prognostic factors in ypN0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision.Ann Surg Oncol,2011,18:3666-3672.
  • 6Bipat S,Glas AS,Slors FJ,et al.Rectal cancer:local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US,CT,and MR imaging-a meta-analysis.Radiology,2004,232:773-783.
  • 7O'Neill BD,Brown G,Heald RJ,et al.Non-operative treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.Lancet Oncol,2007,8:625-633.
  • 8Kuremsky JG,Tepper JE,McLeod HL.Biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,74:673-688.
  • 9Moureau-Zabotto L,Farnault B,de Chaisemartin C,et al.Predictive factors of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,80:483-491.
  • 10Janjan NA,Abbruzzese J,Pazdur R,et al.Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.Radiother Oncol,1999,51:153-160.

共引文献10

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部