我国司法公开的实践探索与路径思考

Practice and Route of Judicial Publicity in China

司法公开是法治中国的重要内容,它是人民主体性理论在法治领域的深化体现,也是宪法权威理论的应有之意,自党的十八大以来司法方面的改革不断在推进与深化,构建和完善了裁判文书公开平台;确立了网络司法拍卖全面公开原则;完善司法办案责任制,强化监督制约机制等,这些举措取得了诸多积极的成效,增强了公众对法院的了解与信任,也增强了法院的自信,同时也强化了法官的自我督促。而针对进一步的深化改革与完善,例如如何对司法公开和司法信息保密关系进行妥善处理,以及如何加大对司法的投入,缩小各地在落实司法公开工作上的差异等,亦需积极地思考具体的路径选择。

Judicial disclosure is the core content of the rule of law in China, it is the embodiment of the theory of the people＇s subjectivity in the field of the rule of law, and the meaning of the constitutional authority theory. Since the 18 th CCP＇s Conference, Judicial discolosure has developed to establish and perfect the open platform of the referee instruments; to establish the principle of comprehensive public openness of the network judicial auction; to improve the accountability system of judicial handling, to strengthen the supervision and control mechanism, etc. These initiatives have achieved many positive results, enhanced public understanding and trust of the court, while also enhanced the self-confidence of the court; also strengthened the judge＇s self-supervision. And for further deepening reform and improvement, such as how to enforce judicial disclosure, how to handle judicial information confidential relations properly, how to increase investment in the judiciary, and how to reduce the implementation of judicial work in the differences, etc., which are needed to actively think specifically and find the path of choice.