摘要
目的评价麻醉学习班学员培训中采用GasMan软件辅助教学对吸入麻醉药理论学习的作用。方法2011~2015年参加解放军总医院麻醉科进行吸入麻醉培训的96名学习班学员,通过计算机产生随机序列,分为试验组(S组)和对照组(C组),每组48例。所有学员进行吸入麻醉理论测试1的测试,记录考试成绩;参加6学时吸入麻醉理论授课后,S组学员进行GasMan软件教学C组学员自学吸入麻醉参考资料,之后进行理论测试2的测试,记录考试成绩。结果S组和C组测试1成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);S组测试2成绩明显高于C组(P〈0.05)。100%S组学员均认为理论讲授结合GasMan计算机软件教学比单纯理论讲授更有利于吸入麻醉药理论学习,能提高课堂学习兴趣;79%(38/48)的学员认为GasMan软件容易掌握;96%(46/48)的学员对这一学习方式表示有兴趣,愿意参加学习讨论并分享自己的经验,90%(43/48)的学员认为有必要在所属医学中心开展这类教学活动。结论与传统讲授式教学比较,应用GasMan软件病案分析教学能够提高吸入麻醉示教课的教学效果。,
Objective To evaluate the role of GasMan software computer assisted in the theoretical study of inhaled anesthetics. Methods Ninty-six trainees were randomly divided into test group (group S) and control group (group C), with 48 persons in each group. All the persons underwent anesthesia theory test 1 and recorded test scores; After 6 inhalation anesthesia teaching, GasMan software computer assisted was teached in group S while self-study inhalation anesthesia reference in group C. Results there was no statistically significant difference between group S and group C in test 1. Compared with group C, the scored of test 2 in group S was significantly increased. 100% of the persons believe that the teaching of combining GasMan~ computer assisted was more beneficial than pure theory, which can improve the interest of classroom study. 80%(38/48) persons believed that GasMan software was easy to master, 96%(46/48) persons expressed interest in this learning method, willing to participate in the study, 90% (43/48) persons thinked it was necessary to develop this kind of teaching activities in the medical center. Conclusions compared with the traditional teaching, application GasMan software computer assisted teaching can improve the teaching effect of inhaled anesthesia.
出处
《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》
CAS
2017年第9期826-829,共4页
International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基金
北京市科学技术委员会资助项目(Z171100001017061)
北京市属医院科研培育资助项目(PZ2017028)
首都中医药专项(17ZY04)