期刊文献+

风洞结构对试验段静压系数和静压梯度的影响 被引量:3

Influence of Wind Tunnel Structure on Static Pressure Coefficient and Static Pressure Gradient of the Test Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 静压系数和静压梯度是评估汽车风洞试验段流场品质的重要参数.以数值仿真为主,风洞试验为辅的方法研究了风洞结构对试验段静压系数和静压梯度的影响.通过研究发现,使用包含2个拐角的计算模型进行静压系数和静压梯度仿真,可以得到真实的结果.无论是大喷口还是小喷口,收集口高度为270mm时,对应试验段静压系数和静压梯度最平缓,试验段可用长度最长,对试验测量影响最小.对于大喷口,随着收集口高度降低,收集口处静压系数和静压梯度不断下降;当收集口高度为240mm时,靠近收集口处的静压系数和静压梯度变为负值.对于小喷口,收集口面积远大于喷口面积,气流到达收集口的速度有所减少,当地静压系数和静压梯度均为正值. The static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient are key parameters to estimate the flow quality of automotive wind tunnel test section. Numerical simulation was used along with wind tunnel test to study the influence of wind tunnel structure on static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient of the test section. It is found that real results can be obtained by simulation of the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient using the computational model with two corners. No matter it is big or small nozzle, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient corresponding to the collector height of 270 mm is the gentlest and the effective length of test section is the longest, which has the slightest impact on measurement. For the big nozzle, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient at the position of collector is decreasing constantly with the reduction of the height of collector. When the height of collector is 240 mm, the static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient close to the collector becomes negative. For the small nozzle, the area of the collector is much larger than that of the nozzle so that the velocity of airflow at the collector decreases, which contributes to a positive value of the local static pressure coefficient and static pressure gradient.
作者 李启良 戴文童 杜开颜 杨志刚 LI Qiliang DAI Wentong DU Kaiyan YANG Zhigang(Shanghai Automotive Wind Tunnel Center, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China Shanghai Key Lab of Vehicle Aerodynamics and Vehicle Thermal Management Systems, Shanghai 201804, China)
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期1506-1511,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 上海市地面交通工具风洞专业技术服务平台项目(16DZ2290400) 国家自然科学基金(11502171)
关键词 风洞结构 试验段 静压系数 静压梯度 收集口高度 wind tunnel structure test section static pressure coefficient static pressure gradient collector height
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1郑志强,彭为,靳晓雄.汽车风洞声学控制研究[J].噪声与振动控制,2006,26(3):64-66. 被引量:7
  • 2郑志强,王毅刚,杨志刚.一种抑制低频颤振的控制方法在模型风洞中的试验研究[J].汽车工程,2007,29(5):369-371. 被引量:6
  • 3Stephen A A, Tony D B, Michael Z. On low-frequency pressure pulsations and static pressure distribution in open jet automotive wind tunnels[C]//Social Automotive Engineering. [S. L. ] : SAE, 1999 - 01 - 0813.
  • 4Gerhand W, Wilhelm V H, Stephen W. Wind tunnel pulsation and their active suppression[C]//Social Automotive Engineering. [ S. L. ] : SAE, 2000 - 01 - 0869.
  • 5Shih T H,Liou W W,Shabbir A,et al. A new κ - ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows: model development and validation[J]. Computers and Fluids, 1995,24 (3) :227.
  • 6Launder B E, Spalding D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows[J]. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974,3(2) : 269.
  • 7中国人民解放军总装备部军事训练教材编辑工作委员会.高低速风洞气动与结构设计[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2003.
  • 8Kunstner R, Potthoff J, Essers U. The aero-acoustic wind tunnel of Stuttgart university [C]// Social Automotive Engineering. [S. L. ] : SAE, 1995 : 950625.
  • 9Launder B E, Spalding D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows [ J ]. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2) : 269.
  • 10Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, et al. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows: model development and validation[J]. Computers and Fluids. 1995, 24(3): 227.

共引文献17

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部