摘要
为探讨违规和违法事件中,旁观者对不同社会身份行为者的责任归咎是否具有一致性,研究要求被试对三组不同身份匹配条件下(官员/普通人、富人/普通人以及官员/富人)的违规和违法行为进行责任归咎,结果发现,无论是对违规行为,还是对违法行为,人们对具有官员身份的行为者的责任归咎最为严苛,对具有富人身份的行为者的责任归咎其次,而对既非官员也非富人的普通人的责任归咎则相对宽容,因而责任归咎中具有明显的身份效应。
In order to investigate whether the social identity of transgressors influences the blame judgment on the observed immoral behaviors, three groups of partici- pants were asked to evaluate the blameworthiness for the transgressors with behaviors that violate social regulations or laws and with three different pan'led i- dentities (officials vs. ordinary people, the rich vs. ordinary people, and officials vs. the rich). It was found that no matter the transgressors violate the so- cial regulations or laws, the observers blame the transgressors who are officials highest, the rich sec- ond and ordinary people lowest. Such findings indi- cate that a definite identity effect can be observed on the blame judgment.
作者
黄文军
段继鹏
尹军
张锋
HUANG Wen-jun DUAN Ji-peng YIN Jun ZHANG Feng(Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
出处
《应用心理学》
CSSCI
2017年第4期366-375,317,共11页
Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(16YJC190026)