期刊文献+

多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗与单纯化疗比较治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效和安全性的Meta分析 被引量:1

Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(tyrosine kinase inhibitors,TKIs)联合化疗与单纯化疗比较治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索The Cochrane Library、Pub Med和EMBase数据库,搜集TKIs联合化疗与单纯化疗比较治疗晚期NSCLC的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均为建库至2016年12月。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取数据和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入12个RCT,共6 559例患者。Meta分析结果显示:TKIs联合化疗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)[HR=0.86,95%CI(0.81,0.91),P<0.001]和客观缓解率(ORR)[HR=1.43,95%CI(1.20,1.70),P<0.001]均高于单纯化疗组。但两组在中位生存时间(OS)[HR=0.91,95%CI(0.82,1.00),P=0.06]、疲劳发生率[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.97,1.11),P=0.33]、呼吸困难发生率[RR=1.01,95%CI(0.91,1.13),P=0.82]和咳嗽发生率[RR=1.01,95%CI(0.89,1.15),P=0.91]方面差异均无统计学意义。但TKIs联合化疗组的中性粒细胞减少发生率[RR=1.16,95%CI(1.05,1.28),P=0.003]、血小板减少发生率[RR=1.46,95%CI(1.23,1.73),P<0.001]、腹泻发生率[RR=2.09,95%CI(1.81,2.37),P<0.001]和高血压发生率[RR=2.91,95%CI(2.28,3.71),P<0.001]均高于单纯化疗组,而贫血发生率[RR=0.86,95%CI(0.75,0.98),P=0.03]低于单纯化疗组。结论与单纯化疗相比,TKIs联合化疗可延长患者中位无进展生存期和客观缓解率,可作为晚期NSCLC患者的一种治疗手段。受纳入研究的数量和质量限制,上述结论仍需开展更多高质量研究予以验证。 Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods An electronically search was conducted in The Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMbase databases from inception to December 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for NSCLC. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 6 559 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: The median progression free survival (PFS) (HR=0.86, 95%CI 0.81 to 0.91, P〈0.001) and objective response rate (ORR) (HR=1.43, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.70, P〈0.001) of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy were significantly longer than those of the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences between two groups in incidence of median overrall survival (OS) (HR=0.91, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.00, P=O.06), fatigue (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.11, P=0.33), dyspnea (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.13, P=0,82) and cough (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.15, P=0.91). However, the incidence of neutrocytopenia (RR=1.16, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.28,P=0.003), thrombocytopenia (RR=1.46, 95%CI 1.23 to 1.73, P〈0.001), diarrhea and hypertension (RR=2.91, 95%CI 2.28 to 3.71, P〈0.001) of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy group were significantly higher than those of the chemotherapy group. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy group had lower rate of anemia (RR=0.86, 95%CI 0.75 to 0.98, P=0.03). Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy alone, tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy can improve the median PFS and ORR while it can be used as a treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2017年第10期1198-1204,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 化疗 META分析 随机对照试验 Non-small cell lung cancer Tyrosine kinaseinhibitors Chemotherapy Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trail
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献67

  • 1贡联兵.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的进展与评价[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2006,6(6):329-332. 被引量:9
  • 2Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevaxizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(24): 2542-2550.
  • 3Laurie SA, Arnold A, Shepherd FA, et al. National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group study BR.24, a randomized placebo controlled phase Ⅱ trial ofcediranib (CED) plus carboplatin+paclitaxel (C+P) in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer of any histology: Further analyses. J Thorac Oncol, 2008, 3 (suppl): S304.
  • 4Kim ES, Kies MS, Fosssella FV, et al. Phase II study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib with paclitaxel in patients with taxane-refractory/ resistant non small cell luang carcinoma. Cancer, 2005, 104(3): 561-569.
  • 5Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAIL. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(8): 1227-1234.
  • 6Herbst RS, Blumenschein Jr GR, Kim ES, et al. Sorafenib treatment efficacy and KRAS biomarker status in the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial. Proc ASCO, 2010, 28: 15s (suppl; abstr 7609).
  • 7Scagliotti GV, Krzakowski M, Szczesna A, et al. Sunitinib (SU) in combination with Erlotinib (E) for the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase III study. Ann Oncol, 2010, 21(S8): viiil-viiil2 (Abstract LBA6).
  • 8Spigel D, Ervin T, Ramlau R, et al. randomized multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled phase ii study evaluating metmab, an antibody of met receptor, in combination with erlotinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol, 2010, 21 (S8): viii 1-viii 12 (Abstract LBA 15).
  • 9Pfister DG, Johnson DH, Azzoli CG, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer guideline: update.J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(2): 330-353.
  • 10Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (10): 947-957.

共引文献17

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部