摘要
被追诉人阅卷权作为辩护权的必要配置、知情权的重要保障、律师阅卷权的有力补充以及自行辩护的基本要求,在我国刑事诉讼法中没有得到明确体现,司法实务中也由于传统司法理念的桎梏而处于灰色地带,争议不断。但在域外,被追诉人阅卷权已经在学界引起了热议,欧洲人权法院通过若干判例确立了该制度,并推动了德国、奥地利、日本、俄罗斯等国以及我国台湾地区对被追诉人阅卷权进行相应的程序设计。因此,应从立法层面上明确确立被追诉人享有阅卷权,并对被追诉人行使阅卷权的范围、阶段、方式、例外以及救济等进行具体的程序设计,以期对日后构建被追诉人阅卷制度提供一个可行性的实施方案。
The accused person's right of reviewing files is not clearly prescribed and belongs to the grey zone in China's criminal lawsuit due to the confinement of traditional judicial concepts although it is a necessary allocation of the right to defense,an important guarantee of the right to know,a powerful supplement of lawyer's right of reviewing files and a basic requirement of self-defense. In other countries,the accused person's right of reviewing files has aroused a heated discussion and European Court of Human Rights has established this system via several cases to promote it in Germany,Austria,Japan and Russia. Chinese Taiwan region also conducts relevant procedural design as to the accused person's right of reviewing files. Therefore,the accused person's right of reviewing files shall be prescribed clearly in legislation and the relevant scopes,phases,modes,exceptional cases and remedies shall also be made clear in China. As a result a feasible implementation plan can be achieved.
作者
梁玉霞
岳静
Liang Yu- xia Yue Jing(School of Law, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2017年第4期41-49,共9页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
被追诉人
阅卷权
辩护权
知情权
the accused person
right of reviewing files
right to defense
right to know