期刊文献+

心脏中心一日病房模式行冠状动脉造影及血运重建术的探讨 被引量:1

Study on coronary artery angiography and revascularization in day care ward of heart center
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨心脏中心一日病房模式行冠状动脉造影必要时支架术,冠状动脉搭桥术的可行性、安全性以及对绩效指标的影响.方法 回顾性分析2014年10月至2016年12月在一日病房行冠状动脉造影必要时支架术并转入普通病房,或择期行冠状动脉搭桥术的128例患者手术成功率,术中及术后不良事件(死亡,心肌梗死及介入并发症:冠状动脉痉挛、夹层、穿孔和闭塞,造影剂过敏,患者上肢水肿,骨筋膜室综合征和桡动脉闭塞),平均住院日,医疗费用.结果 一日病房行单纯冠状动脉造影者76例,行支架植入术者35例,冠状动脉搭桥术者17例,成功率为100%,不良事件主要为桡动脉痉挛5例,穿刺部位血肿3例和造影剂过敏1例;与同期普通病房相比,一日病房单纯造影者[(1.0±0.2)d比(3.0±1.2)d],行介入治疗者并转入普通病房者[(2.0±0.5)d比(4.0±1.5)d],转入普通病房择期行冠状动脉搭桥者[(9.0±2.2)d比(12.0±2.9)d]平均住院日显著缩短(P〈0.05),住院医疗费用有下降趋势(P〉0.05).结论 一日病房模式行冠状动脉造影及必要时血运重建术在诊疗技术成熟的心脏中心是安全可行的. Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety and impact on performance indicators of coronary angio graphy, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in day care ward of heart center. Methods 128 patients performing coronary angiography and receiving stent implantation or coronary artery bypass surgery when necessary from October 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The success rate of procedure, intraoperative and postoperative adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and interventional complications: coronary artery spasm, dissection, perforation and occlusion, contrast agent allergy, upper extremity edema, patients with osteofascial compartment syndrome and radial artery occlusion), average hospitalization days and medical expenses were compared with patients at the same period in general ward. Results Seventy-six cases underwent coronary angiography, among whom 35 cases received stent implantation and 17 cases received coronary artery bypass grafting. The success rate was 100%. Adverse events were radial artery spasm in 5 cases, puncture site hematoma in 3 cases and contrast agent allergy in 1 case. Day care ward significantly shortened the average hospitalization days (P〈0.05); there was a downward trend, although there was no statistical difference in hospitalization expenses (P〉0.05). Conclusions Coronary angiography and revascularization at the day care ward model is safe and feasible in the heart center if diagnostic and therapeutic techniques are mature.
作者 夏经钢 郝恒剑 尹春琳 徐东 Xia Jinggang Hao Hengjian Yin Chunlin Xu Dong
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2017年第8期717-720,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 可行性研究 一日病房 安全性 Coronary artery disease Feasibility studies Day care ward Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献53

  • 1周汉新,王新民,贺务实.缩短平均住院日对医疗质量与效益的影响[J].中国卫生质量管理,2006,13(2):11-13. 被引量:31
  • 2Kiemeneij F , Laannan GJ. Transradial artery Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation : results of a single-center feasibility study [ J ]. Am Heart J,1995,130( 1 ) :14 -21.
  • 3Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ,et al. Incidebce and outcome of radia artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty [J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1997,40(2) :156 - 158.
  • 4Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis,1989.3-7.
  • 5Amoroso G,Laarman GJ,Kiemeneij F. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Cardiovascular Medicine,2007.230-237.
  • 6Jolly SS,Amlani S,Hamon M. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J].American Heart Journal,2009.132-140.
  • 7Saito S,Ikei H,Hosokawa G. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions,1999,(2):173-178.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-4.
  • 8Scanfon PJ,Faxon DP,Audet AM. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography.A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on coronary angiography).Developed in collaboration with the society for Cardiac angiography and Interventions[J].Journal of the American College of Cardiology,1999.1756.1824.
  • 9Caputo RP. Transradial arterial access:economic considerations[J].Invasive Cardio1,2009.18-20A.
  • 10Block PC,Ockene I,Goldberg RJ. A prospective randomized trial of outpatient versus inpatient cardiac catheterization[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1988.1251-1255.

共引文献37

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部