期刊文献+

不确定多属性决策中区间数排序的一种新方法 被引量:4

An New Method of Interval Numbers Ordering in Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision-making
原文传递
导出
摘要 根据格序决策理论,提出不确定多属性决策中区间数排序的新方法,将综合评价值区间数分为可比较与不可比较区间数,对可比较区间数利用区间数上界进行比较来排序,而对不可比较区间数利用均值及区间上界比较来排序,方法比格序决策法和期望-方差法等方法更加简单易行,进一步提高了决策效率.最后通过算例验证方法的可行性和有效性. There are many methods in resolving the multiple attribute decision-making problem, but their calculating quantity is big, so that it has affected decision-making efficiency. For the sake of making up the above-mentioned defects, The interval numbers of synthesis evaluation value are divided into comparison interval numbers and uncomparison interval numbers, the comparison interval numbers are ordered by making use of interval upper bound, and the uncomparison interval numbers are ordered by making use of mean value comparison and interval block upper bound, this method is easy to do more supplely than that of lattice order decision-making and that of mean-variance, which decision-making efficiency can be verified higher, at last the fact is tested by two method comparison calculating examples.
作者 侯景亮 李远富 迟红娟 HOU Jing-liang LI Yuan-fu CHI Hong-juan(School of Civil Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China School of Traffic, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2017年第18期24-27,共4页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(71203083)
关键词 多属性决策 区间数 格序决策 multiple attributes decision-making interval numbers lattice order decision- making
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献61

  • 1徐泽水.模糊综合评价的排序方法研究[A]..Systems Engineering, Systems Science and Complexity Research [C].Research Information Ltd出版社, Hemel Hempstead Hp2 7TD, United Kingdom,2000.507- 511.
  • 2杜栋.AHP判断矩阵一致性问题的数学变换解决方法[A]..决策科学及其应用[C].北京:海洋出版社,1996.99—104.
  • 3Hawng C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making[ M ]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg New York,1981.1-107.
  • 4Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989,40(7):681-686.
  • 5Brson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,96:379-386.
  • 6Sajjad Z M. Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991,53 :206-216.
  • 7Birkhoff G. Lattice theory[ M]. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Volume XXV, Providence, 1973.1-280.
  • 8Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis : A practical approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40(7): 681- 686.
  • 9Huynh V-N, Nakamori Y, Tu-Bao Ho, et al. Multiple- attribute decision making under uncertainty: The evi- dential reasoning approach revisited[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part A) : Systems and Humans, 1EEE Transactions, 2006, 36(4): 804-822.
  • 10Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. EurJOperRes, 1996, 96(3) : 379-386.

共引文献489

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部