期刊文献+

英语写作评价与反馈模式嬗变的现实启示 被引量:3

ESL Writing Assessment and Feedback:Overview and Implication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为英语写作教学的有机组成部分,写作评价与反馈在二语写作教学中发挥着重要的作用。从教师评价与反馈,到学生同伴评价与反馈,再到今天的网络智能评价,既具有许多优势,但同时也依旧难掩各种缺陷和不足。促学型评价理论启示我们:未来二语写作评价与反馈,应切实实现评价主体由他方向学习者自己转变,充分发挥学习者的主体作用,通过学习者自我评价,准确把握自己写作的薄弱环节,从而做出有针对性的补救,以切实提高英语写作能力,同时在评价方式上也应实现从主观性整体印象评价向客观性评价的变革。 Assessment and feedback is an essential part and also plays an important role in ESL writing. Either teachers' assessment and feedback, or peers', and even the present popular artificial intelligent assessment, possesses many advantages, but still shortcomings concealing. Assessment for learning requires the transformation of self assessment and feedback instead of by others to maximize and improve the affect of assessment and feedback in ESL writing, besides the new realization of objective evaluation instead of basing the assessment and feedback on the overall subjective impression in the present.
作者 李军
出处 《大学英语教学与研究》 2017年第4期25-29,共5页 College English Teaching & Research
关键词 二语写作 评价与反馈 评述 促学型评价 ESL writing assessment & feedback review assessment for learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献72

  • 1高莉莉.专业英语写作教学中同级讨论的有效性研究[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2004,3(3):152-154. 被引量:10
  • 2蒋宇红.在线同伴评价在写作能力发展中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(3):226-230. 被引量:122
  • 3张雪梅.大学英语写作教学现状之调查[J].外语界,2006(5):28-32. 被引量:142
  • 4Attali, Y. 2004. Exploring the feedback and revision features of criterion [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
  • 5Attali, Y. &J. Burstein. 2006. Automated essay scoring with e-raterar^Rv. 2 [OL]. http://escholarship, bc. edu/cgi/viewcontent, cgi? article = 1049&context-- jtla (accessed 16/03/2010).
  • 6Chen, E. & E. Cheng. 2008. Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes [J]. Language Learning & Technology 12: 94-112.
  • 7Dernyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 8Elliot, S. & C. Mikulas. 2004. The impact of MY Access ! use on student writing performance.. A technology overview and four studies [R]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA., America, April 2004.
  • 9Ericsson, P. & R. Haswell (eds.). 2006. Machine Scoring of Student Essays : Truths and Consequences [C]. Logan, UT. : Utah State University Press.
  • 10Grimes, D. 2008. Assessing automated assessment.. Essay evaluation software in the classroom [OL]. ftp://ftp, ics. uci. edu/pub/grimesd/AutoAssessment, pdf (accessed 20/06/2010).

共引文献424

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部