期刊文献+

目的性反刍性沉思对老年肠造口病人病耻感与生活质量的中介作用 被引量:14

Mediation role of “rumination meditations in purpose” between stigma and quality of life among elderly colostomy patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨老年肠造口病人病耻感与生活质量间的关系及目的性反刍性沉思的中介作用。[方法]采用方便抽样法,对343例老年结肠造口病人,采用一般资料调查表、社会影响量表、事件相关性反刍性沉思问卷、造口病人生活质量量表进行问卷调查。[结果]老年结肠造口病人社会影响量表、事件相关性反刍性沉思问卷、造口病人生活质量量表得分分别为66.74分±10.18分,13.36分±4.13分,51.23分±10.18分。Pearson相关分析结果显示老年肠造口病人病耻感与目的性反刍性沉思、生活质量呈负相关(r值分别为-0.39,-0.52,P<0.01),目的性反刍性沉思与生活质量呈正相关(r值为0.46,P<0.01)。中介效应检验显示,目的性反刍性沉思对病耻感与生活质量起部分中介作用(36.4%)。[结论]造口对老年病人的病耻感、目的性反刍性沉思和生活质量存在不同程度的影响。 Objective:To investigate the relationship between stigma and quality of life in elderly colostomy patients,and the mediating effect of rumination meditations in purpose.Methods:A total of 343 elderly colostomy patients were selected by convenient sampling method;they were investigated by General Information Questionnaire,Social Impact Scale(SIS),Event Related Rumination Inventory(ERRI)and Stoma-QOL.Results:The scores of SIS,ERRI,Stoma-QOL were(66.74±10.18)(13.36±4.13),and(51.23±10.18),respectively.The Pearson correlation analysis showed that stigma of elderly colostomy patients was negatively related with rumination meditations in purpose and quality of life(r=-0.39,-0.52;P0.01).Rumination meditations in purpose were positively related to the quality of life(r=0.46,P0.01).The mediator effect test showed that rumination meditations in purpose partially mediates the relationship between stigma and quality of life(36.4%).Conclusions:Colostomy influenced the stigma,rumination meditations in purpose and quality of life of elderly patients in different degrees.
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2017年第10期3516-3519,共4页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助项目 编号:A2016500
关键词 肠造口 病耻感 目的性反刍性沉思 生活质量 老年人 中介作用 colostomy stigma rumination meditations inpurpose quality of life the elderly mediation role
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献126

  • 1覃惠英,郑美春,温咏珊,张惠芹,王玲燕.结肠造口患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J].癌症,2004,23(z1):1589-1592. 被引量:61
  • 2张华,李峥.肠造口病人的分期护理[J].护理研究,2004,18(10):1700-1702. 被引量:27
  • 3覃惠英,尤黎明,郑美春,张惠芹,王玲燕,温咏珊.家庭护理干预对提高肠造口病人生活质量的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(6):418-421. 被引量:151
  • 4[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 5[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 6[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 7[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 8[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 9[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 10[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312

共引文献8028

同被引文献215

引证文献14

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部