期刊文献+

新规范框架结构强柱弱梁措施效果评估 被引量:2

Effect evaluation on strong column and weak beam measures of frame structure in the new code
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了了解我国新颁布的规范对框架结构强柱弱梁措施提高柱端弯矩增大系数的效果,分别按照新旧规范设计设防烈度7度(0.1 g)3级框架结构和设防烈度8度(0.2 g)2级框架结构,采用时程动力分析程序,输入不同频谱的地震波,计算不同设防烈度框架结构在罕遇地震作用下的结构反应,对比分析框架结构的位移、层间位移角和塑性铰。结果表明,设防烈度为7度(0.1 g)3级框架结构,不同频谱地震波作用下新旧规范楼层顶点最大位移差值不超过1 mm,层间位移角最大差值不超过0.12%,新规范提高柱端弯矩增大系数效果不大。旧规范规定的柱端弯矩增大系数足以保证框架结构大震不倒。设防烈度为8度(0.2 g)2级框架结构,不同频谱地震波作用下新旧规范楼层顶点最大位移差值较明显,层间位移角最大差值不超过0.21%,新规范柱端弯矩增大系数效果明显,但其安全性与设防烈度为7度(0.1 g)3级框架结构相比,仍有较大差距。建议进一步提高其柱端弯矩增大系数,以充分保证其大震不倒的安全性。 In order to evaluating effect on the moment magnifying coefficients of strong column-weak beam measures at column ends of frame in the new code, seismic grade 3 frame of seismic precautionary intensity 7 (0.1 g) and seismic grade 2 frame of seismic precautionary intensity 8 (0.2 g)are designed in accordance with the old and new design codes, respectively. A time history dynamic analysis are proceeded to calculate the response of various pre- cautionary intensity frames under rare seismic wave through putting in different frequency spectrum seismic waves. The displacements, the story drift angles and the plastic hinges of the frame structures are compared and analyzed. The results show that, for seismic grade 3 frame of seismic precautionary intensity 7 (0.1 g), the maximum dis- placement margins of the top story between the old and new codes are not more than 1 mm under different frequency spectrum seismic waves, and the story drift angle margins are not more than 0.12%. The improving effects of mo- ment magnifying coefficients at column ends in the new code is very little, at column ends in the old code is sufficient to ensure the security of frame grade 2 frame of seismic precautionary intensity 8 (0.2 g), the maximum tween the old and new codes are obvious under different frequency spectrum and the moment magnifying coefficients under rare seismic wave . For seismic displacement margins of top story be- seismic waves, and the story drift angle margins are not more than 0.21% ,in which the effect is obvious. Compared with seismic grade 3 frame of seismic precautionary intensity 7 (0.1 g), its security has still a large gap. It is suggested that the moment magnifying coef- ficients at column ends is further improved to ensure the security of frame under rare seismic wave.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期128-135,共8页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(51379142) 河北省教育厅青年基金项目(QN20131177) 河北省科技厅基金项目(15275802)
关键词 框架结构 强柱弱梁 层间位移角 抗震等级 塑性铰 frame strong column and weak beam story drift seismic grade plastic hinge
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1陈立保,陈明祥,高作平,范振中,吴帆.主厂房空间框架中考虑楼板作用的有限元分析[J].工业建筑,2005,35(z1):420-422. 被引量:8
  • 2杨红,白绍良.抗震钢筋混凝土结构承载力级差设计法的实质[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2000,22(z1):93-101. 被引量:8
  • 3蒋永生,陈忠范,周绪平,鲁宗悫.整浇梁板的框架节点抗震研究[J].建筑结构学报,1994,15(6):11-16. 被引量:93
  • 4杨红,韦锋,白绍良,王珍.柱增强系数取值对钢筋混凝土抗震框架塑性铰机构的控制效果[J].工程力学,2005,22(2):155-161. 被引量:27
  • 5楼宝堂.中国古今地震灾情总汇[M].北京:地震出版社,1996..
  • 6CHAKER A A, CHERIFATI A. Influence of masonry infill panels on the vibration and stiffness characteristics of R/C frame buildings [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1999, 28(9).
  • 7FRENCH CW, MOEHLE JP. Effect of floor slab on behavior of slab- beam-column connections [ J ]. Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance, SP-123, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 1991.
  • 8LEON RT. The effect of floor member size on the behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column joints[ J ]. Proceedings of 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, Calif., 1984.
  • 9PAULAY T. Developments in the design of ductile reinforced concrete Frames [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1979, 12(1).
  • 10AMMERMAN OV, WOLFGRAM-FRENCH C. RC beam-column-slab subassemblages subjected to lateral loads [J].Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989, 115(6).

共引文献271

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部