期刊文献+

语言的“政治”:对20世纪40年代文学发展路向的一种考察——以路翎和赵树理为例 被引量:2

Political Analysis of Language:An Exploration of Literature Development in 1940s——A Case Study of Lu Ling and Zhao Shuli
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言风格是作者个人文学观念和选择的反映,也从一个角度反映了文学"现代化"进程中的多种取向和可能。路翎的"欧化"语言既是现代启蒙立场上深度剖析人物精神世界的文学观念的反映,又从语言层面上拓展了启蒙精神的表现空间。赵树理的"大众化"语言则恰恰是针对"五四"新文学"欧化"语言及相应的文学现代化路径的质疑与超越,通过"民族化""大众化"形式探索"反现代性"的文学现代化道路。 The language style is the reflection of an author's personal literary ideas and choices,and it also reflects the various orientations and possibilities in the process of "modernization" of literature.Lu Ling's "Europeanized" language is not only a reflection of the depth analysis of character's spiritual world on the basis of modern enlightenment position,but also extends the expression space of the enlightenment spirit from the linguistic level.Zhao Shuli's "popularized" language questions and transcends precisely "Europeanized" language of the May 4th New Literature and the corresponding literary modernization path,exploring the "anti-modernity" literary modernization path through the form of "nationalization" and "popularization".
作者 周荣
出处 《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第5期95-101,共7页 Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 语言 路翎 赵树理 欧化 大众化 language Lu Ling Zhao Shuli europeanization popularization
  • 相关文献

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部