期刊文献+

司法保护视角下的隐私权类型化 被引量:15

Analysis of Categorization in the Right of Privacy under the Perspective of Judicial Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 隐私权作为抽象概念有利于保护新兴的隐私利益,但也因其内涵的概括性和外延的不确定性造成司法实践中法律适用的不安定和侵权责任的判定困难。类型化的分析方法具有划定隐私权的保护范围、区分隐私权具体类型、克服其不确定性弊端的功能。以司法案例为基础并厘清其选取范围后,以权利客体为主要标准将隐私权侵权类型分为侵犯私生活安宁、侵犯私生活秘密和侵犯个人一般信息,根据侵权行为、权利主体等要素再进一步划分下位类型,具体分析每一类型的判定基准和侵权责任,以期为立法完善隐私权保护体系奠定基础,为司法裁判隐私权案件提供参考。 As an abstract concept, the right of privacy is conducive to the protection of the emerging private interests, but its generality of connotation and uncertainty of extension results in the instability of the law application and difficult de- termination of tort liability. The method of typologically analysis can decide the protection scope of the right of privacy, dis- tinguish specific types of privacy rights and overcome the uncertainty disadvantage of privacy. On the basis of judicial cases and after making clear of selection range of cases, divide the privacy right into the peace of life, private secret and personal general information based on the object of right. In addition, take tort behavior and subject of right as the standard to fur- ther divide inferior types and analyze the defining principle and tort liability specifically. In this way, it may be helpful for providing the basis of perfecting the privacy protection system in the legislation as well as providing the reference rules for judges to adjudicate cases of privacy right.
作者 冷传莉 李怡
机构地区 贵州大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期79-89,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 贵州大学文科重点学科及特色学科重大科研项目:(GDZT2017005号)"法律思维下的民事实体与程序问题协同研究" 贵州大学研究生创新基金项目:(研人文2015022)"我国隐私权的类型化分析"
关键词 隐私权类型化 生活安宁 生活秘密 个人一般信息 司法保护 the analysis of categorization in the right of privacy the peace of life private secret personal general information judicial protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献177

共引文献2311

引证文献15

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部