摘要
停止侵害作为知识产权法中的基本救济制度,尚缺乏理论研究的重视与立法建构的关切。停止侵害的限制性、选择性适用路径突破了旧有法则和传统制度范式,高度契合利益平衡的精神蕴含,为域外学说判例所采纳运用,且于我国司法实践环节亦有体现。我国知识产权制度应在理论上反思检讨知识产权"类财产权"的保护模式,坚持停止侵害救济方式与知识产权制度特质、宗旨的内在统一。宜从民法与知识产权法两大制度维度来重塑停止侵害救济的立法模式与规则体系,消解多元利益冲突引发的制度困境,以补充完善现行规范之缺漏。
As the basic relief system in the intellectual property law, permanent injunction is still lack of theoretical re- search and legislative concern. The restrictive and selective application path of permanent injunction breaks through the old law and the traditional system paradigm. It is highly compatible with the spirit of the balance of interests, for the use of ex- traterritorial theory cases, and in China~ judicial. The intellectual property system in China should in theory reflects on the protection paradigm of "propertization of intellectual property", and adhere to the internal unity of permanent injunction and the characteristics and purpose of intellectual property system. Viewing the existing system, to explore new paths, our country should follow the intrinsic characteristics of the intellectual property system and the development of the general law, the interests of balancing mechanism constructed under the auspices of the permanent injunction system, digestion and con- flicts in the public interest to bring a system loss predicament to complements the inadequacy of existing legal norms.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期101-114,共14页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
德国马克斯.普朗克学会创新与竞争研究所访问学者项目(2015-2016)
国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FFX009)"知识产权法中的停止侵害救济权"
关键词
知识产权
停止侵害
救济
利益
intellectual Property
permanent Injunction
relief
interests