摘要
对人工智能创作物的可版权性判断,应该以"额头出汗"原则建立起独创性判断的客观标准。虽然人工智能不是"人",但也不是"物"。不能因为人工智能创作物的创作主体不是自然人,就否定其可版权性。将智能作品纳入传统版权分析框架,它实际上是一种人工智能对设计版权的演绎作品。人工智能之"智能",将设计者之设计版权与智能作品上的版权区分开来。而对于智能作品上的权利配置,应该以所有者与使用者之间的约定优先,建立起以所有者为核心的权利构造,以鼓励投资人并促进人工智能技术的长足发展。
When we judge creation generated by artificial intelligence should or shouldnt be granted with copyright, we should take "Sweat of the Brow" as the primary doctrine, establishing an objective standard to check originality. Ahhough artificial intelligence isnt "human", it also cannot be viewed as "object". we shouldnt deny creationg copyrightability just because the creator isn t human. Taking creation generated by artificial intelligence into the traditional copyright analysis framework, we will figure out that it is actually a kind of deductive work based on software program. Artificial intelligence separates creations copyright from programmer~ copyright. When it comes to the allocation of creation~ right, owners and users" agreement ought to be prior, and then, we should set up the right structure focusing on owners, aiming at encouraging investors and promoting the development of artificial intelligence technology.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期137-147,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
人工智能
智能作品
自然人
版权
邻接权
artificial intelligence
creation
natural person
copyright
neighboring right