摘要
科索沃境内的民族冲突是导致科索沃独立的一个重要动因,其独立很大程度上是美国策划和推动的结果。国际法院认为一般国际法中没有适用禁止宣布独立的规定,并得出结论认为安理会第1244(1999)号决议与《科索沃临时自治宪政框架》构成答复大会征求咨询意见时应该考虑的国际法的一部分。故国际法院在经过分析后最终认为科索沃的独立宣言没有违反任何适用的国际法规则。本文通过分析,指出"科索沃独立咨询意见"在国际社会的消极影响明显远超过积极影响。中国应通过综合努力促使国际法朝更加积极和完善的方向发展。
The ethnic conflict in Kosovo is an important drive of Kosovo's independence,and its independence is largely the result of planning and promotion in the United States.The International Court of Justice held that there was no application in the general international law to prohibit the proclamation of independence and concluded that UN Security Council Resolution 1244(1999) and the Kosovo Provisional Constitutional Constitutional Framework constituted part of the international law that should be considered in response to the UN General Assembly's request for advice.The International Court of Justice,after analysis,concluded that the Kosovo Declaration of Independence did not violate any applicable rules of international law.Through this analysis,it is pointed out that the negative impact of the ICJ's Kosovo Independent Advice in the international community is far more than its positive one in the international community. China should make a comprehensive effort to promote the development of international law in a more positive and impeccalde direction.
出处
《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第5期38-41,108,共5页
Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基金
2016年度中国博士后科学基金第59批面上一等资助"中国参与极地治理的行为机制分析"(2016M590718)
关键词
国际法院
“科索沃独立咨询意见”
国际法
大国政治
the international court of justice(ICJ)
the ICJ's Kosovo independent advice
international law
power politics