期刊文献+

种植体支持的单端悬臂修复体的临床疗效:系统回顾和meta分析

Marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with and without cantilever-a systematic review and meta analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估种植体支持的单端悬臂修复的留存率、成功率(无并发症)和边缘骨吸收,并评价悬臂长度对种植体支持的单端悬臂修复效果影响。方法:检索截止2016年5月1日在Pubmed和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库收录的相关英文临床研究文献,从符合纳入标准的文献中提取种植体留存率、种植修复成功率和边缘骨吸收等数据并进行meta分析。结果:检索到相关的题目和摘要263条,最终纳入16篇文献。6篇文献报道了种植体支持的局部固定义齿,meta分析显示是否带有单端悬臂梁对其成功率、种植体留存率和边缘骨吸收均无显著影响。10篇文献报道了种植体支持的全口义齿,其种植体留存率为97%~100%,种植修复成功率为52%~98%,平均边缘骨吸收为0.23~1.73 mm。没有文献报道悬臂长度对种植修复有不良影响。结论:种植体支持的单端悬臂修复体是一个可预期的治疗选择。当种植体支持的局部固定义齿悬臂梁<9 mm,种植体支持的全口义齿悬臂梁<15.6 mm时,可以获得较好的临床疗效。 PURPOSE: The aim of the present review was to evaluate the clinical parameters and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with cantilever; and to assess the influence of cantilever length on the clinical parameters and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with cantilever. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 1st, 2016 for articles on implant-supported prostheses with cantilever. Meta analysis was performed for studies reporting implant success rate, implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of implant-supported prostheses with and without cantilever. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-three titles and abstracts were retrieved from the electronic search for possible inclusion in the review. Finally, 16 studies were included. For implant-supported fixed partially prostheses, meta analysis showed no significant differences in implant survival, success and marginal bone loss. For implant-supported full arch prostheses, 10 studies reported that survival rate ranged from 97% to 100%, success rate ranged from 52% to 98% and marginal bone loss ranged from 0.23 to 1.73 mm. No unfavorable effect of cantilever length was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, implant-supported fixed partial prostheses with cantilever could be considered as a predictable treatment option. High survival rates and acceptable marginal bone loss were reported in implant-supported full arch prostheses with cantilever. The cantilever length less than 9 mm was safe in implant-supported partial prostheses, while cantilever length less than 15.6 mm was acceptable in implant-supported full arch prostheses.
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2017年第5期457-462,共6页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81500892) 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床研究助推计划资助项目(JYLJ011)
关键词 悬臂梁 边缘骨吸收 临床评估 系统回顾 Cantilever Marginal bone loss Clinical evaluation Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Becker CM. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 437-441.
  • 2Pjetursson BE, Brigger U, Lang NE Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth supported fixed partial dentures and implant supported fixed partial dentures and single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 97-113.
  • 3Zurdo J, Romeo C, Wennstr6m JL. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 59-66.
  • 4Blanes RJ, Bernard Jt', Blanes mix/l, elser uc. A iv-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 707-714.
  • 5Greenstein G, Cavallaro J Jr. Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141: 1221-1230.
  • 6Balevi B. Implant-supported cantilevered fixed partial dentures. Evid Based Dent 2010; 11: 48-49.
  • 7Anderson JD. Ten-year survival rate for cantilevered fixed partial dentures. Evid Based Dent 2005; 6: 96-97.
  • 8Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri- implant diseases. J Clin Periodonto12008; 35:286-291.
  • 9Jemt T, Johansson J. Implant Treatment in the edentulousmaxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 61-69.
  • 10Esposito M, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomized clinical trial. Eur J Oral lmplanto12011; 4:21-30.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部