期刊文献+

知信行延续性护理教育在院外糖尿病患者中的应用 被引量:9

The application of knowledge-attitude-behavior continuing nursing education in diabetic patients out of the hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨院外糖尿病患者延续性护理教育的效果。方法:成立延续性糖尿病护理教育小组,为出院糖尿病患者提供规范性、系统性、连续性的知信行教育,为期3个月。实施前后对患者的疾病知信行、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)进行比较分析。结果:实施前后,患者的疾病认知能力、疾病信念、疾病相关行为评分较干预前明显提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);末梢空腹血糖、餐后2 h末梢血糖无明显变化,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);HbA1c明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:知信行延续性护理教育在院外糖尿病患者中应用具有可行性、有效性,可以为糖尿病患者提供专业服务,改善患者的知信行。 Objective: To explore the effect of continuing nursing education in patients with diabetes mellitus out of the hospital. Methods: The continuous diabetes care education group was established to provide a standardized,systematic,continuous knowledge of education for the discharge of diabetes patients for a period of 3 months. Before and after the implementation,the disease knowledge-attitude-behavior,fasting blood glucose,postprandial 2 h blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin( HbA1c) of the patients were compared and analyzed. Results: Before and after the implementation,the disease cognitive ability,disease beliefs and disease-related behavior scores of the patients were significantly higher than those before the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in peripheral fasting blood glucose and postprandial 2 h blood glucose and the difference was no statistical significance( P〉0. 05). The HbA1c was significantly improved and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05).Conclusion: It is feasible and effective to apply the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuity nursing education to the patients with diabetes mellitus. It can provide professional services for patients with diabetes mellitus and improve the patient's knowledge,attitude and behavior.
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2017年第17期45-47,共3页 Nursing Practice and Research
基金 苏州市科技局课题(SYSD2014110)
关键词 院外 糖尿病 知信行 延续性教育 效果 Out of the hospital Diabetes Knowledge - attitude - behavior Continuing education Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1Hu DY, Pan CY, Yu JM. The relationship between coronary artery disease and abnormal glucose regulation in China: the China Heart Survey[J]. Eor Heart J, 2006, 27(21 ) :2573-2579.
  • 2Bartnik M, Ryd6n L, Ferrari R, et al. The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe. The Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart [J]. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(21 ) :1880-1890.
  • 3American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33 ( Suppl 1 ) :S62- S69.
  • 4International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes [J]. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(7) :1327-1334.
  • 5World Health Organization. Use of glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1 c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Abbreviated report of a WHO consultation[ R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
  • 6Ryd6n L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pro-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre- diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) [ J]. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(39) :3035-3087.
  • 7Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation[ J]. Diabet Med, 1998, 15 (7) :539-553.
  • 8American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [ J]. Diabetes Care, 2014, 37 (Suppl 1 ) :S81- S90.
  • 9Doerr R, Hoffmann U, Otter W, et al. Oral glucose tolerance test and HbAlc for diagnosis of diabetes in patients undergoing coronary angiography the Silent Diabetes Study [ J ]. Diabetologia, 2011, 54 ( 11 ) : 2923-2930.
  • 10Harati H, Hadaegh F, Tohidi M, et al. Impaired fasting glucose cutoff value of 5.6 mmol/L combined with other cardiovascular risk markers is a better predictor for incident type 2 diabetes than the 6. 1 mmol/1 value: Tehran lipid and glucose study [ J ]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2009, 85 (1) :90-95.

共引文献148

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部