期刊文献+

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical significance of preservation of left colon artery in laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉的临床价值。方法腹腔镜直肠癌根治术患者89例,术中保留左结肠动脉46例(保留组),不保留左结肠动脉43例(不保留组)。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、回肠造口和并发症,观察术后2年肿瘤局部复发及转移率。结果保留组手术时间较不保留组长[(187.10±41.37)min vs.(152.30±31.34)min](P<0.05),两组术中出血量及清扫淋巴结数目差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。保留组术中无回肠造口、术后无吻合瘘发生;不保留组术中回肠造口5例,术后吻合口瘘3例。术后3个月,保留组无吻合口狭窄,不保留组吻合口狭窄7例。术后2年,保留组吻合口复发3例,肝转移4例;不保留组吻合口复发4例,肝转移2例。结论腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉可以有效保证吻合口血供,减少吻合口狭窄的发生。 Objective To explore the clinical value of the preservation of left colon artery in laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer.Methods A total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer was divided into two groups of A(preserving left colon artery,46cases)and B(not preserving left colon artery,43cases).The operative time,blood loss during surgery,the number of lymph nodes removed,ileostomy and postoperative complications were compared.The incidences of local reoccurrence and metastasis in two years after operation were observed.Results The operative time was longer in group A than that in group B[(187.10±41.37)min vs.(152.30±31.34)min](P〈0.05).The blood loss during surgery and the number of lymph nodes removed in group A were similar to those in group B(P〈0.05).In group B,ileostomy was performed in 5cases,postoperative anastomotic leakage occurred in 3cases and anastomotic stenosis three months after surgery occurred in 7cases.There were no cases with ileostomy,postoperative anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis in group A.In two years follow-up,group A had 3cases with anastomotic local recurrence and 4cases with liver metastasis,which were 4cases and 2cases in group B,respectively.Conclusion The preservation of left colon artery in laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer can effectively preserve blood supply of proximal intestine,reduce the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2017年第18期1328-1330,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 直肠癌 左结肠动脉 吻合口瘘 Rectal carcinoma Left colon artery Anastomotic leakage
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1Cao, Jun,Liu, Wen-Jia,Xu, Xin-Yun,Zou, Xiao-Ping.Endoscopic findings and clinicopathologic characteristics of colonic schistosomiasis:A report of 46 cases[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(6):723-727. 被引量:13
  • 2曹志新,徐向上,杨传永.直肠癌术中从根部结扎肠系膜下动脉临床意义探讨[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(12):942-944. 被引量:23
  • 3Lujan J,Valero G,Biondo S,et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer:results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients[J].Surg Endosc,2013,27(1):295-302.
  • 4Zhao JK,Chen NZ,Zheng JB,et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer:results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical efficacy[J].Mol Clin Oncol,2014,2(6):1097-1102.
  • 5Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, et al. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed [J]. Surg Oncol, 2012,21 (3):elll-e123. DOI: I0.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.004.
  • 6Komen N, Slieker J, de Kort P, et al. High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011,26 (8) : 1075-1078. DOI : 10.1007/s00384- 011-1188-6.
  • 7Lange JF, Komen N, Akkerman G, et al. Riolan's arch: confusing, misnomer, and obsolete. A literature survey of the connection (s) between the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries[J]. AmJ Surg, 2007,193 (6) :742-748. DOI: 10.1016/j. amjsurg.2006.10.022.
  • 8Lange MM, Buunen M, van de Velde C J, et al. Level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. A review [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51(7):1139- 1145. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y.
  • 9Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Fomasari V, et al. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal resection for complicated diverticular disease[J]. Am J Surg, 2001,182(2) : 162-167.
  • 10Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N, et al. High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012, 55(5) :515-521. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318246fla2.

共引文献109

同被引文献66

引证文献8

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部