期刊文献+

高龄与非高龄患者永久性起搏器植入的比较分析

Clinical effect of permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation in elderly and non-elderly patients:a comparative analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨老年高龄患者植入永久起搏器的安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析我院2014年1月至2015年12月接受心脏永久起搏器植入治疗的125例患者,分为高龄组与非高龄组,比较分析其基线资料、起搏器适应征、起搏电极参数、并发症情况。结果 125例患者分为高龄组31例和非高龄组94例。基线资料比较提示高龄组冠心病患病率明显高于非高龄组。在起搏器适应征和起搏电极参数方面高龄组与非高龄组比较均无统计学差异。高龄组发生1例起搏器相关并发症,非高龄组发生4例并发症,两组无差别。结论老年高龄患者植入心脏永久起搏器是安全有效的。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 125 patients who underwent permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015. These patients were divided into elderly group and non-elderly group, and the two groups were compared in terms of baseline data, indications for pacemaker,pacemaker electrode parameters, and complications. Results There were 31 patients in the elderly group and 94 patients in the non-elderly group. Baseline data showed that the elderly group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with coronary heart disease than the non-elderly group. There were no significant differences in indications for pacemaker and pacemaker electrode parameters between the two groups. One patient in the elderly group and 4 in the non-elderly group experienced pacemaker-related complications, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation is safe and effective in elderly patients.
出处 《心血管病防治知识(学术版)》 2017年第10期57-59,共3页 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
关键词 心脏永久起搏器 高龄 安全性 Permanent cardiac pacemaker Elderly Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1冯义柏.心脏起搏器植入技术指南[J].中华心律失常学杂志,1998,2(3):217-224. 被引量:31
  • 2郝蓬,张英川,方冬平,何东方,李果.超高龄患者永久心脏起搏器植入围手术期常见并发症及处理[J].心肺血管病杂志,2005,24(1):29-30. 被引量:8
  • 3张鸿举,梁毅,叶兴,汪爱虎.97岁高龄患者安装永久起搏器一例[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2005,19(6):431-431. 被引量:2
  • 4Gergoratos G. Permanent pacemakers in older persons [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1999;47(9) :1125-1135.
  • 5Tsang TS, Gersh BJ, Appleton CP, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002;40(9): 1636- 1644.
  • 6Link MS, Estes NA, Griffin JJ, etal. Complications of dual chamber pacemaker implantation in the elderly. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly(PASE) Investigation[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 1998, 2 (2): 175-179.
  • 7Lakhan SE, Harle L. Cardiac fibrosis in the elderly, normotensive athlete: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol, 2008,3 : 12.
  • 8Lelakowski J, Majewski J, Malecka B, et al. Retrospective analysis of reasons for failure of DDD pacemaker implantation in patients operated on between 1993 and 2005. Cardiol J, 2007, 14,155-159.
  • 9Ouali S,Neffeti E,Ghoul K,et al. DDD versus VVIR pacing in patients,aged 70 and over, with complete heart block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2010,33 : 583-589.
  • 10宿燕岗,王蔚,王敏华,柏瑾,葛均波.永久心脏起搏器在高龄患者中的应用[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2007,21(4):333-335. 被引量:13

共引文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部