摘要
目的:观察动脉采血穿刺点按压止血的效果。方法:将200例采血患者随机分为试验组和对照组各100例,试验组采用棉球+宽胶布按压法,对照组仅采用常规棉球按压,观察止血效果。结果:两组止血效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组按压所需时间显著缩短。结论:棉球+宽胶布按压法既能保证止血效果,又能减少按压时间。
Objective: To observe the hemostatic effect of pressing the puncture point of arterial blood sampling. Methods: 200 cases of blood sampiing patients were randomly divided into experimental group (100 cases) and control group (100 cases), the experimental group used cotton-ball + rubberized fabric pressing method, while control group only used conventional cotton-ball pressing, observed their hemostatic effect. Results: There was no significant difference between the hemostatic effect of the two groups (P〉0.05), but the pressing time of experimental group was significantly shortened. Conclusion: cotton-ball + rubberized fabric pressing method can not only guarantee the hemostatic effect, but also reduce the pressing time.
出处
《按摩与康复医学》
2017年第22期43-44,共2页
Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
动脉采血
桡动脉
按压时间
止血
arterial blood sampling
radial artery
pressing time
hemostasis