期刊文献+

软件分层结构故障优化检测仿真研究 被引量:4

Simulation Research on Fault Detection of Software Hierarchical Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于软件分层结构故障的检测,能够更好的提升软件系统的运行质量。在软件体系结构测试中对软件分层结构故障的检测,需要计算故障数据挖掘特征集,将软件故障样本数据的均值定义为软件故障特征量的均值,完成对软件分层结构故障的检测。传统方法先对故障特征进行数据分类处理,给出软件故障特征向量集,但忽略了故障特征量均值的定义,导致检测精度偏低。提出基于决策同态理论的软件体系结构测试中软件分层结构故障挖掘方法。融合于非同态信息增益惩罚因子,构建软件故障的同态区间,对区间内冗余关联软件故障数据进行关联约束,融合于深度网络学习理论获取特征输入向量,计算故障数据挖掘特征集,将软件故障样本数据的均值定义为软件故障特征量的均值,以此为依据完成对软件故障挖掘。仿真证明,所提方法挖掘精度高,可以为提升软件系统的运行质量奠定结实的基础。 A mining method for fault detection of software hierarchical structure in test of software architecture is proposed based on decision homomorphism theory. The homomorphism section of software fault is built integrated with penalty factor for information gain that is not homomorphism, and relevance constraint for fault data of redundancy rel- evance software in section is carried out. The feature input vector integrated with theory of deep network learning is acquired to calculate feature set of fault data mining, and mean value of sample data is defined as its mean value of feature quantity. Thus, the excavation of software fault is completed. Simulation shows show that the proposed method has high excavation accuracy and can promote riding quality of software system and establish stout foundation.
作者 吕莉 LV Li(Sichuan Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, School of Electronic and Information Engineering Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China)
出处 《计算机仿真》 北大核心 2017年第10期371-374,共4页 Computer Simulation
关键词 软件体系结构 分层结构 故障检测 Software architecture Hierarchical structure Fault detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献97

  • 1景涛,江昌海,胡德斌,白成刚,蔡开元.软件关联缺陷的一种检测方法[J].软件学报,2005,16(1):17-28. 被引量:23
  • 2张嗣瀛.复杂性科学,整体规律与定性研究[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2005,2(1):71-83. 被引量:23
  • 3孙卫,罗之兰,张蔚.科学数据共享平台的数据管理研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(12):32-36. 被引量:8
  • 4李果,高建民,高智勇,姜洪权.基于小世界网络的复杂系统故障传播模型[J].西安交通大学学报,2007,41(3):334-338. 被引量:16
  • 5赵靖,张汝波,顾国昌.考虑故障相关的软件可靠性增长模型研究[J].计算机学报,2007,30(10):1713-1720. 被引量:20
  • 6Filman R E, Friedman D P. Aspect-oriented programming is quantification and obliviousness[C]//Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns in Object-Oriented Sytems (OOPSLA '00), Minneapolis, USA, Oct 15-19, 2000. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2000.
  • 7Kniesel G, Bardey U. An analysis of the correctness and completeness of aspect weaving[C]//Proceedings of the 13th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE '06), Benevento, Italy, Oct 23-27, 2006. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2006: 324-333.
  • 8Kniesel G. Detection and resolution of weaving interactions[J]. Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development V, 2009, 5490: 135-186.
  • 9Durr P, Bergmans L, Aksit M. Static and dynamic detection of behavioral conflicts between aspects[C]//LNCS 4839: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Runtime Verification (RV '07), Vancouver, Canada, Mar 13, 2007. Berlin, Heidel- berg: Springer-Verlag, 2007: 38-50.
  • 10Katz E, Katz S. Semantic aspect interactions and possibly shared join points[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Foundations of Aspect-Oriented Languages (FOAL' 10), Rennes, France, Mar 15, 2010. [S.1.] : AOSD, 2010: 43-51.

共引文献43

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部