期刊文献+

3种机用镍钛根管锉中心定位能力的比较

Centering Ability of Three Rotary Nickel-titanium Instruments in Simulated Canals:A Comparative Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种机用镍钛根管锉预备树脂模拟弯曲根管的中心定位能力差异,为临床应用提供实验室依据。方法把30个树脂模拟弯曲根管(弯曲度30°)按照随机数字表分为3组,分别用Reciproc(R组)、Protaper(P组)和WaveOne(W组)机用镍钛根管锉进行根管预备,定位拍摄预备前后模拟弯曲根管的数码照片。应用Photoshop软件进行预备前后图像的提取和重叠。应用Digimizer软件在11标尺条件下测量距离根尖孔每1mm根管中心点在预备前后的偏移量,每根管测量10个位点。用单因素方差分析和Student-Newman-Kuels检验进行统计学检验(α=0.05)。结果在距离根尖1、2和3mm水平上,3组根管中心点向弯曲外侧偏移;在6、7和8mm水平上,3组根管中心点向弯曲内侧偏移,且R组和W组的中心定位能力优于P组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),R组和W组的中心定位能力差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。在距离根尖4、5、9和10mm水平上,各组之间的根管中心定位能力差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 Reciproc和WaveOne的中心定位能力相近,且比Protaper在根尖区和根管弯曲最大部位具有更好的中心定位能力。 Objective To compare the centering ability of three rotary nickel-titanium instruments Reciproc,Protaper and WaveOne in resin-simulated curved root canals.Methods A total of 30 resin-simulated curved canals(curvature=30°)were divided into 3 groups(n=10 each)using the random number table.They were prepared with Reciproc(group R),Protaper(group P)and WaveOne(group W)respectively.Pre-and post-operative images were obtained by a digital camera at the fixed position,and superimposed through Photoshop.The center displacement between pre-and post-operative images were measured at 10 points beginning at 1mm from the end point of the canal with the software Digimizer at a ratio of 1 to 1.The data were analyzed through one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Kuels at a significance level ofα=0.05.Results The central point was shifted laterally to the curve at 1,2,and 3 mm from the end point of the canal,while it shifted medially to the curve at 6,7,and 8mm.The centering ability was better in groups R and W than in group P with significant differences noted(P0.05).No significant difference was found in the centering ability between group R and group W.Also there were no significant differences in the centering ability at 4,5,9and 10 mm among the three groups(P0.05).Conclusion Reciproc and WaveOne have similar centering ability.They preform better in terms of centering location than Protaper,especially at the apex and the most curved part of the canal.
作者 袁理 李飒 黄盛兴 Yuan Li Li Sa Huang Shengxing(Department of Stornatology , Shenzhen People's Hospital, The 2nd Clinical Medical Collegel of Ji'nan University, Shenzhen 518020, China)
出处 《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第5期567-570,共4页 Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
基金 深圳市科技计划资助项目(No.JCYJ20140416122812030)
关键词 根管制备 镍钛根管锉 单支锉 中心定位能力 root canal preparation nickel-titanium instruments single files centering ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1Liu SB, Fan B, Cheung GS, et al. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile[J]. Am J Dent, 2006, 19(6):353-358.
  • 2Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, et al. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three enginedriven instrumentation techniques[J]. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(5):354-358.
  • 3Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B. Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(5):619-622.
  • 4De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, et al. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(12):1063-1068.
  • 5Park SK, Kim YJ, Shon WJ, et al. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy[J]. Scanning, 2013. doi:10.1002/sca.21096.
  • 6Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2):271-275.
  • 7Zhang C, Huang W, Sun Z, et al. A comparison of two guttapercha master points consisting of different phases in filling of artificial lateral canals and depressions in the apical region of root canals when using a warm vertical compaction technique[J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(11):1041-1046.
  • 8Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations[J]. Int Endod J, 2008, 41(4):339-344.
  • 9Yoo YS, Cho YB. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2012, 37(4):220-227.
  • 10Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(11):1589-1593.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部