期刊文献+

运用无创容量指标评价儿童先天性心脏病术后液体反应性 被引量:7

Application of Non-invasive Volume Parameters to Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Children Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的运用连续多普勒超声心排量监测仪(ultrasonic cardiac output monitor,USCOM)对先天性心脏病(先心病)术后患儿液体治疗前后进行血流动力学监测,比较血流动力学指标如中心静脉压(central venous pressure,CVP)、每搏量变异度(stroke volume variation,SVV)、校正血流时间(corrected flow time,FTc)及肌力指数(smith madigan inotropy index,SMII)等预测先心病术后患儿液体反应性的准确性。方法应用USCOM对先心病术后患儿进行液体治疗前后血流动力学的监测。根据液体治疗前后的每搏输出量指数(stroke volume index,SVI)计算每搏输出量指数变化率(ΔSVI),根据正性肌力药物的使用情况计算出正性肌力药物评分(inotropic scores,IS)。定义液体治疗后ΔSVI≥15%为液体治疗有反应组,<15%为液体治疗无反应组;根据正性肌力药物的使用情况分亚组:IS≤10组及IS>10组。结果 (1)全部患儿中仅SVV的ROC曲线下面积(area under the ROC curve,AUC)具有评估液体反应性的价值(AUC为0.776,P<0.01);(2)亚组中:IS≤10组及IS>10组中也表现为仅SVV的AUC具有评估液体反应性的价值(AUC分别为0.732,P<0.05及0.813,P<0.01)。结论 (1)用USCOM监测的SVV可以预测先心病术后的液体反应性,而CVP、FTc及SMII均不能准确预测先心病术后的液体反应性;(2)亚组中,IS>10组SVV预测液体反应性的准确性要高于IS≤10组。 Objective To use ultrasonic cardiac output monitor(USCOM)to monitor the hemodynamics of children who underwent congenital heart disease(CHD)surgery before and after fluid therapy,and to examine the accuracy of the hemodynamic parameters central venous pressure(CVP),stroke volume variation(SVV),corrected flow time(FTc)and smith madigan inotropy index(SMII)in predicting fluid responsiveness of children post operation.Methods USCOM was used to monitor the hemodynamic parameters of post-operative children before and after fluid therapy.The change of SVI(ΔSVI)was calculated based on the stroke volume index(SVI)before and after fluid therapy,and the inotropic scores(IS)were obtained based on the doses of inotropic drugs used.Children withΔSVI≥15% were defined to be responders who responded to fluid resuscitation and those withΔSVI15% as non-responders.Two subgroups were also established in terms of IS:IS≤10 group and IS10group.Results Among the parameters(CVP,FTc and SM,etc.),only the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of SVV was significantly different between before and after fluid therapy(AUC 0.776,P0.01).Subgrouping analysis also showed significant difference in only the AUC of SVV between IS≤10group and IS10group(AUC:0.732,P=0.045 or 0.813,P=0.002).Conclusion SVV monitored by USCOM,in contrast to CVP,FTc and SMII,can predict the fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart surgery.Prediction of fluid responsiveness by SVV shows higher accuracy in IS10group than in IS≤10group.
作者 程玉薇 许峰 李静 Cheng Yuwei Xu Feng Li Jing(Department of Emergency Department of PICU, Children' s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders Key Laboratory of Pediatrics of Chongqing Chongqing International Science and Technology Cooperation Center for Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing 400014 , China)
出处 《华中科技大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第5期593-599,共7页 Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong
基金 重庆市卫生局项目(渝卫科教(2013)39号文)
关键词 先天性心脏病 超声心排血量监测仪 每搏量变异度 校正血流时间 中心静脉压 congenital heart disease ultrasonic cardiac output monitor stroke volume variation corrected flowtime central venous pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Darmon PL,Hillel Z,Mogtader A,et al.Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiographyusing continuous wave Doppler across the aortic valve.Anesthesiology,1994,80(4):796-805.
  • 2Quinones MA,Otto CM,Stoddard M,et al.Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography:a report from the Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American society of echocardiography.J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2002,15(2):167-184.
  • 3Critchley LA,Peng ZY,Fok BS,et al.Testing the reliability of a new uhrasonic cardiac output monitor,the USCOM,by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.Anesth Analg,2005,100(3):748 753.
  • 4van Lelyveld-Haas LE,van Zanten AR,Borm GF,et al.Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2008,25(11):917-924.
  • 5Chand R,Mehta Y,Trehan N.Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2006,20(3):315-319.
  • 6Wong LS,Yong BH,Young KK,et al.Comparison of the USCOM ultrasonnd cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilntion in patients undergoing liver transplantation.Liver Trunspl,2008,14(7):1038-1043.
  • 7Tan HL,Pinder M,Parsons R,et al.Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.Br J Anaesth,2005,94 (3):287-291.
  • 8Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients [J ]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(6): 1029-1034.
  • 9Stewart RM, Park PK, Hunt JP, et al. Less ismore: improved out- comes in surgical patients with conservative fluid administration and central vemms catheter monitoring [J].J Am Coil Surg, 2009,208(5):725 -735.
  • 10Soni N. British consensus guidelines on intravenous fluid thera- py for adult Surgical patients(GIFTASUP):cassandra's view [J]. Anaesthesia, 2009, 64(3):235-238.

共引文献13

同被引文献43

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部