期刊文献+

非期望环境行为的类型及其行为呈现——调节聚焦影响视角 被引量:2

Undesired Environmental Behavior and its Presentation—The Impact to Regulatory Focus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将漠视性和破坏性行为加以整合,提出"非期望环境行为"的概念,区分了非期望环境行为的3种类型:自发型、跟随型、防御型,并探讨了其行为呈现。鉴于行为与个体心理偏好及关注点的相关性,进一步分析调节聚焦对非期望环境行为的影响。通过对474名大学生的调查与分析显示:个体非期望环境行为总体发生率为50.5%,具有高发特征,其中自发型非期望环境行为发生率达32.9%,占比最高;常态发生(得分>=4)非期望环境行为的个体占比为21.0%,其中46.3%为防御型非期望环境行为;预防聚焦对非期望环境行为总体有显著负向预测作用,促进聚焦对跟随型非期望环境行为有显著负向预测作用;调节聚焦为"双低型"的个体,最容易发生非期望环境行为,且出现"翘尾"现象。据此,从非期望环境行为发生动机出发,结合调节聚焦的影响特征对非期望环境行为的干预提出建议。 Disregard behavior and destructive behavior were reorganized in this study to put forward the concept of undesired environmental behavior,then we distinguished three types of undesired enviromnental behavior,including spontaneous,followed and defensive and explored their presentation format. Given the relationship between behaviors and individual psychological preference or concerns,the influence of regulatory focus on undesired environmental behavior was analyzed in further. According to 474 data from undergraduates,the findings indicated that the overall incidence rate of individual environmental behavior was 50.5%,characterizing with high incidence, among which, the incidence rate of spontaneous undesired environmental behavior had the highest proportion of 32.9%; the incidence rate of normal undesired environmental behavior(the score was greater than or equal to 4) was 21.0% ,with the incidence rate of defensive undesired environmental behavior accounting for 46.3%; the prevention focus had negative prediction effect on undesired environmental behavior,while the promotion focus had negative prediction effect on followed undesired enviromnental behavior; it was the easiest for individuals whose regulatory focus was double-low to perform undesired environmental behavior,characterizing with the phenomenon of "tail up". Based on this,from the perspective of behavior motivation,relevant recommendations were put forward combing the influence of regulatory focus on undesired environmental behavior.
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2017年第5期28-36,共9页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71473248 71273258 71473247 71673271 71603255 71603257) 江苏省"青蓝工程"项目资助(2012) 江苏省"333高层次人才培养工程"项目资助(2016) 中国矿业大学第八批优秀创新团队项目资助(2015ZY003) 江苏省研究生教育教学改革研究与实践课题(JGZZ16_078) 江苏省社科基金基地项目资助(14JD026) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(KYLX16_0513)
关键词 非期望环境行为 自发、跟随、防御型行为 调节聚焦 undesired environmental behavior spontaneous,followed and defensive behavior regulatory focus
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献157

  • 1孟雁.群体动力理论在高校案例教学中的启示与实践[J].现代企业教育,2006(22). 被引量:5
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7615
  • 3谢彦君.旅游体验的两极情感模型:快乐—痛苦[J].财经问题研究,2006(5):88-92. 被引量:71
  • 4黎建新,詹志方.消费者绿色购买研究述评与展望[J].消费经济,2007,23(3):93-97. 被引量:34
  • 5Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308.
  • 6Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
  • 7Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
  • 8Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
  • 9Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 10Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232.

共引文献1482

同被引文献20

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部