期刊文献+

上海高校本科专业达标评估及其量化问题探讨

Exploration of Reaching Standard Evaluation and Its Quantization for University Undergraduate Specialty in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上海市教委两个文件"沪教委高[2013]31号"和"沪教委高[2015]18号"的附件提供的"上海高校本科专业达标评估指标体系"中的评价指标体系属于定性与定量的混合式评价指标体系,且用户都不十分满意。该指标体系没有贯彻分类别、分层次评价的思想,对教师和学生的要求都偏低。从发展看,有必要建立全量化的评价指标体系。 The index systems about reaching standard evaluation of university undergraduate specialties in Shanghai area, which were given in attachments of two documents(SEC Gao[2013]No. 31 and the SEC Gao[2015]No. 18) issued by the Shanghai Education Committee(SEC), confused qualitative and quantitative assessment systems, and were not very satisfied by users. They did not implement the idea that the evaluation should distinguish the different categories and the variant hierarchies. The requirements of the evaluation index systems to teachers and students seem to be quite low. From the view of development, it is necessary to establish an assessment index system with full quantization.
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2017年第4期61-64,75,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 上海电机学院重点教研教改项目(B1-0224-16-002-019)成果
关键词 本科专业 达标评估 定量指标体系 定性指标体系 混合指标体系 Undergraduate specialty Reaching standard evaluation Quantitative indexsystem Qualitative index system Hybrid index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献2

  • 1教育部教育管理信息中心.国际教育标准分类法[J].教育参考资料,1998,(358).
  • 2武书连.再探大学分类[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002,23(10):26-30. 被引量:213

共引文献575

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部