全程护理干预对宫颈癌患者护理质量的效果分析

Analysis on the effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on nursing quality of cervical cancer patients

目的分析宫颈癌患者行全程护理干预模式的效果,评定护理后对患者生活质量以及婚姻质量的影响。方法选入于2012年3月~2013年3月期间我院妇产科所收治的宫颈癌患者共70例,采用计算机表法的形式将其平均分为研究组和参照组,每组35例。两组患者均行基础护理模式,在此基础上,研究组患者加行全程护理干预模式,比较两组患者术后的生存质量以及婚姻幸福程度。结果研究组的躯体评分、角色评分、认知评分、情绪评分、社会评分以及总分分别为(62.1±7.9)分、(58.6±5.1)分、(62.1±1.5)分、(48.5±7.2)分、(48.12±11.98)分以及(50.2±7.2)分;参照组各项评分分别为(70.1±11.1)分、(62.2±6.0)分、(68.5±9.6)分、(58.23±9.5)分以及(64.2±9.8)分,组间比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。同时研究组婚姻质量优于参照组,研究组的婚姻满意度、夫妻交流评分、角色平等评分分别为(36.2±6.1)分、(33.0±7.1)分、(37.2±5.9)分;参照组上述评分分别为(31.1±6.9)分、(28.2±7.2)分、(32.2±6.8)分,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论将全程护理干预模式应用于宫颈癌患者中,能够有效提升患者的婚姻满意度,改善生活质量,对于临床研究具有重要作用。

Objective To analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention model in cervical cancer patients,and to evaluate the effect of nursing on the quality of life and the quality of marriage in patients. Methods 70 patients with cervical cancer who were admitted to the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in our hospital from March 2012 to March 2013 were selected. The form of computer table method was used to evenly divide the patients into the study group and the reference group, with 35 patients in each group. Both groups were given basic nursing model. On this basis, the study group were further given comprehensive nursing intervention model. The quality of life and the happiness of marriage were compared between the two groups after the surgery. Results The physical scores, role scores, cognitive scores, emotional scores, social scores and total scores in the study group were（62.1±7.9）,（58.6±5.1）,（62.1 ±1.5）,（48.5 ±7.2）,（48.12 ±12.0） and（50.2 ±7.2） respectively; the scores in the reference group were（70.1 ±11.1）,（62.2±6.0）,（68.5±9.6）,（58.23±9.5） and（64.2±9.8） respectively. There was difference between the two groups（P〈0.05）.At the same time, the marriage quality in the study group was better than that in the reference group, and the satisfaction with marriage, husband and wife communication score and role equality score in the study group were（36.2 ±6.1）,（33.0±7.1） and（37.2±5.9） respectively. The above scores were（31.1±6.9）,（28.2±7.2） and（32.2±6.8） respectively in the reference group. The differences were significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The application of comprehensive nursing intervention model in cervical cancer patients can effectively improve the patient＇s marital satisfaction, and improve the quality of life, which has an important role in clinical research.