摘要
农村留守儿童研究的发展,大致可以划分为"标签"、"反思"与"比较"三种范式。"标签"范式经由多元路径建构,倾向于将留守儿童判为"问题儿童";"反思"范式反对泛化留守儿童"问题",认为留守儿童只是新"弱势儿童";"比较"范式引入同一教育生活环境中的参照儿童群体,着重揭示小样本留守儿童的"类"问题。针对已有研究,有必要超越化简、割裂与分离等"简单性"范式的局限,构建农村留守儿童研究的"复杂性"范式,促进留守儿童研究的联结化、多元化和具体化。
The evolution of left behind children in rural areas can be roughly divided into three paradigms: label, reflection and comparison. Through social, academic, media and school construction, the "label"paradigm considers the left-behind children as"problem child"; the "reflection"paradigm based on the criticism of to the "label"paradigm, identities the left-behind children as"new disadvantaged children"; the "comparison"paradigm is based on the contrast of the left-behind children and reference groups of children, to investigate the left-behind children "classification"problem. Constructing the complex paradigm of differentiation under the association and implication of left behind children, which can help overcome the shortcomings of the simplicity paradigm of simplification, separation and separation.
出处
《教育发展研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第18期78-84,共7页
Research in Educational Development
基金
2014年度国家社科基金重点项目:"质量导向的城乡义务教育资源均衡配置的统筹政策研究"(14AGL018)
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"农村留守儿童政策的演进与评估研究"(16JDGH036)
浙江省教育厅高校重大人文社科攻关项目"东部父母出国留守儿童的弱势处境与关爱机制研究"(2014Q019)的部分成果
关键词
农村留守儿童
标签范式
反思范式
比较范式
复杂性范式
rural left behind children, label paradigm, reflective paradigm, comparative paradigm, complex paradigm