期刊文献+

满足电力通信业务时延容忍度的SDN控制策略 被引量:10

SDN Control Strategy for Delay Tolerance of Power Communication Service
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实时性与灵活性的平衡,是软件定义网络(SDN)技术在电力通信网中应用的关键点之一。通过对传统架构下传输网与数据网的时延进行测算,分析得出SDN架构下2种流表下发模式对控制时延的影响,在仿真和测试环境中,基于电力通信业务端到端时延的容忍度,提出基于SDN的跳数控制策略和混合模式流表下发策略,经分析得出:SDN引入的额外控制时延,可以通过对跳数进行控制,从而满足时延容忍度;混合模式流表下发策略可以在满足时延容忍度的前提下,动态平衡实时性与灵活性。 The balance between real-time and flexibility is one of the key points for application of SDN technology in power communication networks. Delay calculation of transmission network and data network under traditional architecture as well as the influence of two flow table release mode on control delay under SDN architecture are described in the article. In simulation and test environment, through comparative analysis, hop control strategy and hybrid mode flow table release strategy are proposed based on end- to-end service time delay of power communication. It is concluded that 1) the additional control delay introduced by SDN can be controlled by hop controlling to meet the delay tolerance, 2) the hybrid mode flow table strategy can dynamically balance real-time and flexibility under the premise of satisfying the delay tolerance.
出处 《中国电力》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期18-21,共4页 Electric Power
基金 国家电网公司科技项目(5455HT170016)~~
关键词 时延容忍度 软件定义网络 流表下发机制 静态模式 动态模式 混合模式 delay tolerance software defined networking flow table release mechanism reactive mode proactive mode hybrid mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献207

  • 1Mckeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, Parulkar G, Peterson L, Rexford J, Shenker S, Turner J. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008,38(2):69-74. [doi: 10.1145/1355734. 1355746].
  • 2Elliott C. GENI: Opening up new classes of experiments in global networking. IEEE Internet Computing, 2010,14(1):39-42.
  • 3Gavras A, Karila A, Fdida S, May M, Potts M. Future Internet research and experimentation: The FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007,37(3):89-92. [doi: 10.114511273445.1273460].
  • 4JGN2plus. 2012. http://www.jgn.nict.go.jp/english/index.html.
  • 5SOFIA. 2012. http://fi.ict.ac.cn/research/sofia_overview.htm.
  • 6Yang L, Dantu R, Anderson T, Gopal R. Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Framework. RFC 3746, 2004. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3746.
  • 7Greenberg A, Hjalmtysson G, Maltz DA, Myers A, Rexford J, Xie G, Yan H, Zhan J, Zhang H. A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2005,35(5):41-54. [doi: 10.1145/1096536. 1096541].
  • 8Caesar M, Caldwell D, Feamster N, Rexford J, Shaikh A, Merwe J. Design and implementation of a routing control platform. In: Proc. of the 2rd USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI). Boston: USENIX Association, 2005. 15-28.
  • 9Casado M, Garfinkel T, Akella A, Freedman MJ, Boneh D, Mckeown N, Shenker S. SANE: A protection architecture for enterprise networks. In: Proc. of the 15th Conf. on USENIX Security Symp. Vancouver: USENIX Association, 2006. 137-151.
  • 10Casado M, Freedman MJ, Pettit J, Luo J, Mckeown N, Shenker S. Ethane: Taking control of the enterprise. In: Proc. of the SIGCOMM 2007. Kyoto: ACM Press, 2007. 1-12. [doi: 10.1145/1282380.1282382].

共引文献762

同被引文献120

引证文献10

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部