期刊文献+

效率与质量的平衡——构建多中心临床试验伦理审查协调体系与平台的设想 被引量:9

Balance of efficiency and quality:conceiving a new framework of multi-center clinical trial ethical review system and coordination platform
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着近年来国内医疗机构承担的多中心临床药物试验项目不断增加,开展这些项目必须的伦理审查出现的质量不一致、效率低下的问题愈发显得突出。为解决上述问题,本文对作者所在机构伦理委员会委员、研究者及试验申办方进行调查;对国内及美国开展多中心临床试验伦理审查情况进行调研和文献分析;比较借鉴美国开展多中心临床试验伦理审查的经验,结合本机构多年的实践,提出在国内构建一个能够平衡效率与质量的,包含中心、联盟、协作伦理审查等模式的伦理审查机制及平台的初步设想。该设想对现行的多中心临床试验伦理审查体系从政策、监管部门、机构伦理委员会建设及审查模式等方面提出了改革建议。 In recent years,multi-center clinical drug trials undertaken by Chinese medical institutions continue to increase,but many ethical reviews of them were carried out differently in different institutions,and have inconsistent quality and low efficiency.To improve the efficiency and quality of these ethical reviews,interviews and discussions were held with authors' Institutional Review Board(IRB) members,principal researchers and sponsors.Literature review was conducted to compare the ways of ethical reviews Chinese IRBs and their counterparts from the Unite States carried out.Combining the experience from the American ethical review system with the practice of the authors' and some others institution,a preliminary idea was expected which constructs a new framework of ethical review mechanism and a platform balances efficiency and quality.This framework includes different reforms in policy making,regulator system,construction of IRBs and review mechanism.
作者 严晋 刘瑜 钟筱华 黎欣盈 YAN Jin LIU Yu ZHONG Xiao-hua LI Xin-ying(Ethics Committee, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou GUANGDONG 510405, China)
出处 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第10期586-592,共7页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词 临床试验 伦理理论 多中心研究 伦理学委员会 clinical trial ethical theory multicenter study ethics committees
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1胡晋红,黄瑾.第二军医大学长海医院伦理委员会标准操作规程[J].药学服务与研究,2006,6(6):473-475. 被引量:4
  • 2国家食品药品监督管理局.药物临床试验质量管理规范(局令第3号).http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL0053/24473.html,2003-08-06.
  • 3Guidance for Industry. Using a centralized IRB review process in multicenter clinical trials, htt://www. fda. gov/cder/ guidance/indece. htm. 2008-11-09.
  • 4US DHHS & FDA. Using a centralized IRB review process inmulticenter clinical trial [ EB/OL] . ( 2006 -03). http ://www.fda. gov/Regulatory Information/Guidances/ucml 27004. html.
  • 5国家食品药品监督管理局.关于印发“药物临床试验伦理审査工作指导原则”的通知[EB/OL]. (2010 - 11 -02). ht-tp://www. sda. gov. cn/WS01/CL0055/55613. html.
  • 6熊宁宁,李煜,汪秀琴,等.临床试验机构伦理委员会操作规程[M].科学出版社,2012:37 -42.
  • 7SILBERMAN G, KAHN KL. Burdens on research imposed byinstitutional review boards : the state of the evidence and its im-plications for regulatory reform [ J ]. Milbank Q, 2011,89 (4):599 -627.
  • 8ADA. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking ( ANPRM). [ EB/OL] . ( 2011 - 06 - 26 ). www. ada. gov/anprm2010/an-prm2010. htm.
  • 9PUTNEY SB. Central IRB review[R],南京:赛诺菲中国研发中心与江苏省人民医院临床研究及伦理高级培训班.2013.
  • 10UK. National research ethics service SOP. [ EB/OL] . [2013 -07 - 01 ]. http ://www. nres. nhs. uk/about-the-national-re-search-ethics-service/about-recs/different-types-of-rec.

共引文献31

同被引文献78

引证文献9

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部