摘要
修昔底德与荷马之争属于古希腊思想史上的古今之争。修昔底德的求真是为了揭示人类生活的真实品性,而绝非在现代史学的客观性上而言。通过探讨伯罗奔尼撒战争的起因和修昔底德对伯利克里的评价,修昔底德"微显阐幽"的"春秋笔法"可以得到诠释。
The controversy between Thucydides and Homer belongs to the controversy between the ancient and the modern in the ancient Greek history.Through the examples of the cause of the war and the remark of Pericles,it can be seen that the truth of Thucydides is different from the objectivity of modern history.
出处
《政治思想史》
CSSCI
2017年第3期152-165,共14页
Journal of the History of Political Thought
关键词
修昔底德
政治史学
历史书写
Thucydides
political history
historical writing
