期刊文献+

分析1.5T与3.0TMR定量评价体外铁浓度模型比较研究 被引量:4

Quantitative measurement of iron concentration in vitro model:a comparative study between 1.5T and 3.0T MRI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MRI对体外不同铁浓度模型定量测量的可靠性,并比较1.5T和3.0T MR对体外铁浓度模型定量测定的准确性。方法:制作2组不同铁浓度体外模型,一组铁浓度范围为0~5.0mg/mL。另一组铁浓度范围为0~1.0mg/mL。两组铁浓度模型分别在1.5T及3.0T MR上进行扫描。扫描序列包括短轴面FSE/T1WI、FRFSE/T2WI、T2map和T2*map。评价测量指标包括T1WI和T2WI信噪比、T2、R2、T2*和R2*值。评价指标的一致性采用组内相关系数分析。铁浓度与T1WI信噪比、T2WI信噪比、T2、R2、T2*和R2*值的关系应用Pearson相关分析。结果:两位研究者对体外铁浓度模型MR图像测量指标T1WI信噪比、T2WI信噪比、T2、R2、T2*和R2*值一致性评价的组内相关系数均大于0.900(P<0.001)。T2WI信噪比、T2和T2*值与铁浓度在1.5T和3.0T MR上均呈非线性相关。在1.5T MR上,当铁浓度≤1.5mg/mL时,T1WISNR、R2与铁浓度呈显著性正相关(P<0.05)。R2*则在铁浓度≤2.5mg/mL时,与铁浓度呈显著正性线性相关(P<0.001)。而在3.0T MR上,当铁浓度≤0.90mg/mL时,R2和R2*值与铁浓度呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论:MRI定量测定体外不同铁浓度模型的可重复性好;在1.5T或3.0T MR各测量参数中,R2*值可准确定量反映体外铁浓度,且1.5T MR检测铁浓度范围宽于3.0T MR。 Objective:To investigate the reliability of quantitative measurement of iron concentration in vitro model using MRI and compare the accuracy between 1.5 Tand 3.0 T.Methods:Two sets of iron concentration in vitro models were made,ranging from 0 mg/mL to 5.0 mg/mL and from 0 mg/mL to 1.0 mg/mL,respectively.The scanning protocol included FSE/T1 WI,FRFSE/T2 WI,T2 map and T2*map on axial section.Two radiologists independently evaluated the MR images of the models.T1 WI signal to noise ratio(SNR),T2 WI SNR,T2,R2,T2*and R2*values were evaluated.Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)was used to evaluate the agreements of the parameters and Pearson correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation between iron concentration and MR measurement indexes.Results:The ICCs of T1 WI SNR,T2 WI SNR,T2,R2,T2*and R2*values evaluated by two radiologists were all more than 0.900(P<0.001).The relation between iron concentration and T2 WI SNR,T2 and T2*values demonstrated function relation on 1.5 T or 3.0 T MR scanner.At 1.5 T MR scanner,when iron concentration was less than 1.5 mg/mL,T1 WI SNR and R2 correlated positively with iron concentration(P<0.05).At 3.0 T MR scanner,when iron concentration was less than 2.5 mg/mL,R2*had a positive correlation with it(P<0.001).When iron concentration was less than 0.900 mg/mL,R2 and R2*were positively correlated with it(P<0.05).Conclusion:MRI is able to quantitatively evaluate iron concentration in vitro model reproducibly.R2*value is the best index to evaluate the iron concentration at either 1.5 Tor 3.0 T MR.The measureable range at 1.5 T MR is wider than that at 3.0 T MR.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2017年第10期1014-1017,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 模型 磁共振成像 Model Iron Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1Konstantinos Tziomalos,Vassilios Perifanis.Liver iron content determination by magnetic resonance imaging[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(13):1587-1597. 被引量:16
  • 2王非,瞿东滨,金大地.椎间盘软骨终板退变及其相关研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):544-546. 被引量:14
  • 3ReichenbachJR. Venkatesan R.Schillinger DJ .et al. Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhcmoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agentD]. Radiology. 1997. 204( 1 ) : 272? 277.
  • 4Sehgal V. Delproposto Z. Haddar D. et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor cont rast in the study of brain massesl]]. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006.21 (I) : 11-51.
  • 5Li D.Waight DJ,Wang Y.et al. In vivo correlation between blood T2' and oxygen saturation[J]. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 ,8 (6): 1236-1239.
  • 6Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, et al. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism[J]. Neuroimage , 2011,54 (4) :2789-2807.
  • 7Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF)[J]. NMR Biomed,2011 ,24(9): 1129-1136.
  • 8Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, et al. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS) : a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med,2009,61(l) :196-204.
  • 9Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition[J]. Neuroimage,2011 ,55(4) ,1645-1656.
  • 10de Rochefort Lv Liu T ,Kressler B,et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization , validation and application to brain imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med,2010,63(l) ,194-206.

共引文献23

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部