期刊文献+

商务言语行为的转喻研究

Metonymic Study of Business Speech Acts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Panther和Thornberg的言语行为转喻理论对商务会话中间接言语行为的构建和语用推理提供了新视角。商务言语行为在商务事态场境框架下进行运作,其言外之意可通过事态场境理论进行合理有效阐释。商务事态场境各组成部分都可以转喻性地指代整个商务事态场境。以商务场境框架为基础的转喻理论可以合理地解释谈话双方为何能够迅速而轻松地推断出彼此的会话意图,对跨文化商务谈判具有重要的实际应用价值。 Speech act metonymy theory, proposed by Panther & Thornberg, renders a brand-new perspective for the construction of indirect speech act and pragmatic inference in business conversations. Business speech acts operate within the framework of the state-of-affairs scenarios with their illocutionary meaning being interpreted by it. Each component is metonymically standing for the whole scenario in business scenarios. Based on business state-of-affairs scenarios, the illocutionary metonymy can reasonably explain why people arrive at the intended meaning so readily and effortlessly in business communication. There- fore, it is of great application value in cross cultural business negotiations.
作者 杨小敏 YANG Xiaomin(School of Foreign Languages, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, Chin)
出处 《淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2017年第11期52-54,共3页 Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 外研社大学外语教学科研项目(2016112803) 滁州学院教研项目(2015jyy028) 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目(SK2015B03)
关键词 商务言语行为 转喻 认知阐释 business speech acts metonymy cognitive interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献67

  • 1陈准民,王立非.解读《高等学校商务英语专业本科教学要求》(试行)[J].中国外语,2009,6(4):4-11. 被引量:416
  • 2张辉.认知语义学述评[J].外语与外语教学,1999(12):4-8. 被引量:35
  • 3Geoffrey Leech.Politeness: Is There an East-West Divide?[J].外国语,2005,28(6):3-31. 被引量:65
  • 4孙亚.误解与言语行为转喻[J].外语教学,2007,28(2):20-23. 被引量:21
  • 5Lakoff G. & M. Johnson Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 6Croft, W. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993, 4 (4): 335-370.
  • 7Thomburg, Linda & Klaus-Uwe, Panther. Speech act metonymies [A]. W. Liebert, G. Redekker & L Waugh. Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997.
  • 8Searle. J. Indirect speech acts [A]. P. Cole & J. Morgan. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts (Vol.3) [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 9Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Tnomburg A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1998, (30): 755-769.
  • 10Panther, Klaus, Uwe & L Thomburg. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. Panther. K & G. Radden. Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部