期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征PCI术后早期恶性室性心律失常的危险因素分析 被引量:13

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后早期恶性室性心律失常(MVA)的危险因素。方法:将170例ACS患者按照PCI术后是否发生MVA分为病例组(n=45例)和对照组(n=125例),对比两组一般资料的差异,利用Logistic回归方程分析MVA发生危险因素。结果:两组在高血压、糖尿病病史、冠脉三支病变、发病至PCI时间、PCI中置入支架个数、应用替罗非班、血浆cTnI、CK-MB、CRP、FPG、BNP、D-D比较差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);Logistic回归方程分析显示:糖尿病病史、冠脉三支病变、发病至PCI时间、cTnI、CRP、BNP是ACS患者PCI后发生MAV的独立危险因素,而PCI术中应用替罗非班为保护因素。结论:糖尿病病史、冠脉三支病变、发病至PCI时间、cTnI、CRP、BNP是ACS患者PCI术后发生的高危因素,临床应当密切注意此类高危因素,积极采用针对性的干预,以改善患者预后。
作者 梁娟
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第10期1415-1416,共2页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1陈韵岱,金泽宁,潘伟琦,宋现涛,朱华刚,吕树铮.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者恶性室性心律失常的发生率、高危因素及预后[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2006,10(1):56-58. 被引量:2
  • 2曹克将.心肌梗死后室性心律失常的发生机制及治疗[J].中国实用内科杂志,2006,26(10):1492-1493. 被引量:3
  • 3Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 4Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 5Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 6Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 7Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 8Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 9Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 10Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.

共引文献501

同被引文献130

引证文献13

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部