期刊文献+

碱性和中性多酶清洗剂清洗复用骨穿针的效果比较 被引量:1

Alkaline and neutral multi enzyme cleaning agent is reusable bone needle cleaning effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析碱性和中性多酶清洗剂清洗复用骨穿针的效果。方法选取苍南县人民医院回收的200件污染复用骨穿针,随机分为2组。对照组利用中性多酶清洗剂进行清洗,浸泡溶液浓度为1/270。实验组利用碱性多酶清洗剂进行清洗,浸泡溶液浓度为1/300。比较分析实验组与对照组的表面清洗合格率、杰力试纸检测合格率与针腔内壁清洗合格率等指标。结果经过不同的清洗剂进行清洗后,实验组器械表面清洗合格件数为98件,对照组器械表面清洗合格件数为97件,实验组与对照组表面清洗合格率分别98.0%与97.0%,差异无统计学意义。实验组针腔内壁清洗合格件数为96件,对照组针腔内壁清洗合格件数为88件,对照组针腔内壁清洗合格率为88.0%显著低于实验组清洗合格率96.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。实验组杰力试纸检测合格率为95.0%显著高于对照组合格率为86.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论碱性多酶清洗剂与中性多酶清洗剂相比,清洗复用骨穿针效果更为理想,能够保证清洗灭菌质量,提高使用寿命。 Objective To compare the effect of alkaline and neutral multi-enzyme cleanser cleaning and reuse of bone through the needle.Methods 200 pollution recycling reusable bone needle,were randomly divided into two groups.The control group was washed with neutral multienzyme detergent,the ratio was 1/270.The experimental group was cleaned by alkaline multienzyme detergent,with a ratio of 1/270.A comparative analysis of the surface cleaning of the experimental group and control group,the qualified rate of strip inspection pass rate and needle cavity wall cleaning qualified rate and other indicators.Results After cleaning with different cleaning agents,the number of qualified surface cleaning of the experimental group was 98 pieces,and the number of qualified surface cleaning of the control group was 97 pieces,he qualified rate of the surface cleaning of the experimental group and the control group was 98.0% and 97.0%,and there was no statistical difference.In the experimental group,the number of the cleaning of the needle cavity wall was 96,and the number of qualified cleaning of the needle cavity wall was 88.In the control group,the qualified rate of the cleaning of the needle cavity wall was 88.0%,significantly lower than that of the experimental group,and the qualified rate of cleaning was 96.0%,which was statistically significant(P〈0.05).The experimental group strip inspection pass rate of 95.0% was significantly higher than the control group of qualified rate was 86.0%,with statistical difference(P〈0.05).Conclusion Alkaline multi enzyme cleaning agent compared with neutral multi enzyme cleaning agent,reusable bone needle cleaning effect is more ideal,to ensure the cleaning and sterilization quality,improve the service life.
出处 《中国生化药物杂志》 CAS 2017年第10期448-449,共2页 Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics
关键词 中性多酶清洗剂 碱性多酶清洗剂 复用骨穿针 neutral multi enzyme cleaning agent alkaline multi enzyme cleaning agent bone needle reuse comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献45

共引文献56

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部