期刊文献+

高龄患者主要照顾者误吸预防知信行问卷编制及信效度分析 被引量:8

Establishment of aspiration prevention knowledge,attitude and practice questionnaire for the primary caregivers in the elderly patients and its reliability and validity testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制高龄患者主要照顾者误吸预防知信行问卷,并进行信效度检验。方法在文献查阅、专家咨询的基础上以知信行理论为框架,初步编制了误吸预防知信行问卷。采用方便抽样法选取204名高龄患者的主要照顾者进行调查以修订问卷,根据调查结果采用区分度分析、相关系数分析、Cronbach'sα系数、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度等方法对该问卷进行评价。结果本问卷共编制32个条目,包括误吸预防知识10个、误吸预防信念11个、误吸预防行为11个。总问卷内部一致性Cronbach'sα系数为0.858,各子问卷的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.874、0.883、0.846,重测信度为0.736;问卷所有条目I-CVI均大于0.830,进行探索性因子分析,问卷公因子累计方差贡献率为69.035%。结论编制的高龄患者主要照顾者误吸预防知信行问卷具有较好的信度和效度,适合在主要照顾者中使用。 Objective To develop a knowledge,attitude and practice questionnaire towards aspiration prevention for the primary caregivers in the elderly patients,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The initial formation of the questionnaire entry pool formed based on KAP theory by using the methods of literature review and expert consultation.204 primary caregivers were selected to carry out the survey by using the convenience sampling method to revise the questionnaire.According to the results of the questionnaire,the questionnaire was evaluated by using the discriminant analysis,correlation coefficient analysis,Cronbach's alpha coefficient,test-retest reliability,content validity and construct validity.Results 32 items were included in this aspiration prevention questionnaire,including 10 items of knowledge,11 items of attitude and 11 items of practice.Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.858,the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of each sub-questionnaire was 0.874,0.883 and 0.846 respectively.And the test-retest reliability was 0.736,all items of questionnaire I-CVI were greater than 0.830.The exploratory factor analysis was conducted,and the cumulative variance contribution of the common factors is 69.035%.Conclusion The KAP questionnaire of aspiration prevention in primary caregivers of elderly patients has good reliability and validity,and it is suitable to use in primary caregivers.
出处 《护士进修杂志》 2017年第20期1836-1840,共5页 Journal of Nurses Training
关键词 高龄患者 主要照顾者 误吸预防 知信行 Elderly patients Primary caregivers Aspiration prevention Knowledge-attitude-practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献71

  • 1袁惠珍,崔涛,胡牧.中国北京与日本东京神经科住院患者护理费用的对比[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(13):145-145. 被引量:4
  • 2朱萍,杨丽娜,余小萍.老年人住院期间误吸的预防[J].解放军护理杂志,2006,23(6):41-43. 被引量:19
  • 3孙美红,刘静,孟娜.新加坡国立大学医院护理组织服务的概况与启示[J].中国实用护理杂志(中旬版),2006,22(7):59-59. 被引量:3
  • 4张建华.老年人护理安全现状调查与分析[J].护理管理杂志,2007,7(7):12-13. 被引量:36
  • 5Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 6Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 7Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 8Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 9Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 10Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.

共引文献1038

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部