期刊文献+

血糖控制方式对冠心病并2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后预后的影响研究 被引量:13

Impact of Blood Glucose Control Mode on Prognosis in Postoperative Coronary Heart Disease Patients Complicated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated by PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血糖控制方式对冠心病并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后预后的影响。方法选取2014年12月—2016年1月于郑州人民医院心内科行PCI的冠心病并T2DM患者303例,根据预后情况分为预后良好组214例与预后不良组89例,根据血糖控制方式分为单纯饮食控制组42例、胰岛素治疗组75例、口服药物治疗组186例。比较不同血糖控制方式患者主要心血管不良事件(MACE)发生情况,冠心病并T2DM患者PCI后预后的影响因素分析采用多因素Logistic回归分析。结果单纯饮食控制组、胰岛素治疗组、口服药物治疗组患者复发心绞痛、非致死性心肌梗死发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);单纯饮食控制组、胰岛素治疗组、口服药物治疗组患者全因死亡率、靶血管血运重建发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。预后良好组与预后不良组患者性别、年龄、吸烟史、高血压发生率、高脂血症发生率、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);预后良好组患者急性冠脉综合征发生率、三酰甘油(TG)、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA_(1c))、C反应蛋白(CRP)低于预后不良组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,急性冠脉综合征[OR=5.119,95%CI(1.256,6.428)]、TG[OR=2.257,95%CI(1.055,4.828)]、空腹血糖[OR=3.074,95%CI(1.521,6.213)]、HbA_(1c)[OR=5.376,95%CI(2.777,10.407)]、CRP[OR=5.853,95%CI(2.442,14.029)]、血糖控制方式[OR=5.830,95%CI(2.564,13.253)]是冠心病并T2DM患者PCI后预后的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论血糖控制方式是冠心病并T2DM患者PCI后预后的影响因素。 Objective To investigate the impact of blood glucose control mode on prognosis in postoperative coronary heart disease patients complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus( T2DM) treated by PCI. Methods From December 2014 to January 2016, a total of 303 coronary heart disease patients complicated with T2DM were selected in the Department of Cardiology,the People' s Hospital of Zhengzhou, all of them received PCI and they were divided into A group( with good prognosis,n = 214) and B group( with poor prognosis,n = 89) according to the prognosis,into C group( received simple diet control,n = 42), D group( received insulin treatment, n = 75) and E group( received oral medication, n = 186)according to the blood glucose control modes. Incidence of MACE was compared in patients with different blood glucose control modes,and influencing factors of prognosis in postoperative coronary heart disease patients complicated with T2DM treated by PCI were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Results There were statistically significant differences of incidence of recurrent angina pectoris and non-fatal myocardial infarction among C group,D group and E group( P 0. 05),while no statistically significant differences of incidence of all-cause mortality or incidence of target vessel revascularization was found among C group,D group and E group( P 0. 05). No statistically significant differences of gender,age,smoking history,incidence of hypertension or hyperlipidaemia,TC,LDL-C or HDL-C was found between A group and B group( P 0. 05);incidence of ACS,TG,FPG,HbA_(1c) and CRP of A group were statistically significantly lower than those of B group( P 0. 05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis results showed that,ACS [OR = 5. 119,95% CI( 1. 256,6. 428) ], TG[OR = 2. 257,95% CI( 1. 055,4. 828) ],FPG [OR = 3. 074,95% CI( 1. 521,6. 213) ],HbA_(1c)[OR = 5. 376,95% CI( 2. 777,10. 407) ],CRP [OR = 5. 853,95% CI( 2. 442,14. 029) ] and blood glucose control mode [OR = 5. 830,95%CI( 2. 564,13. 253) ] were influencing factors of prognosis in postoperative coronary heart disease patients complicated with T2DM treated by PCI( P 0. 05). Conclusion Blood glucose control mode is one of influencing factors of prognosis in postoperative coronary heart disease patients complicated with T2DM treated by PCI.
机构地区 郑州人民医院
出处 《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》 2017年第9期17-20,共4页 Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
关键词 冠心病 糖尿病 2型 血糖 预后 Coronary disease Diabetes mellitus,type 2 Blood glucose Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

  • 1王方杰,王吉昕.胰岛素抵抗与糖尿病、肥胖、冠心病、脂代谢异常的相关性[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2005,13(1):53-55. 被引量:13
  • 2刘灵芝,侯翠红,刘恒亮.冠脉内支架植入术后再狭窄的影响因素分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2005,40(3):533-535. 被引量:8
  • 3白杨,陈艳梅,李颖华,王熙然,于丽云,武云涛,裴育.2型糖尿病患者高尿酸血症的相关因素分析[J].临床军医杂志,2010,38(4):567-569. 被引量:8
  • 4苏林,刘学波,葛均波.糖尿病与冠脉支架再狭窄的关系分析[J].中国临床医学,2005,12(4):578-580. 被引量:20
  • 5中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2010:70.
  • 6Duk-Hee K, Takahiko N, Lili F, et al. A Role for uric acid in the progression of renal disease [ J]. Am Society Nephrolo, 2002,13(12) :2888 -2897.
  • 7Lehto S,Niskanen L,Ronnemaa T,et al. Serum uric acid is a strongpredictor of stroke in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus[ J]. Stroke, 1998,29:635 - 639.
  • 8Seghieri G, Moruzzo D, Fascetti S,et al. Increase in serum uric acid is selectively associated with stroke in type 2 diabetes[J].Diabetes C are, 2002,25 ( 6 ) : 1095.
  • 9Moriwaki Y,Yamamoto T,Takahashi S,et al. Apolipoprotein Ephe- notypes in patients with gout: relation with hypertriglyceridaemia [J]. Ann Rheum Dis,1995,54(5):351 -354.
  • 10Longo-Mbenza B,Luila EL, Mbete P, et al. Is hyperuricemia a risk fact or of stroke and coronary heart disease among africans[ J]. lnt J Card iol, 1999,71 ( 1 ) :17 - 22.

共引文献38

同被引文献129

引证文献13

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部