期刊文献+

参照性交流学习中双方语言相似性的特点及与个人情境的比较

The Similar Characteristics of Language between The Two Sides in the Learning Process of Referential Communication and the Comparison with Individual Situation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究创设参照性交流情境和个人情境,拟探查参照性交流学习中双方语言相似性的特点及与个人情境的比较特点。结果发现:语言杰卡德相似性在学习阶段1~3间差异显著,5与6阶段间差异显著,8~10阶段相邻间差异显著。参照性交流学习block10的语言杰卡德相似性显著高于维度选择结果的杰卡德相似性。结果表明:参照性交流双方语言的相似性程度随着交流进程不断变化,双方语言在交流进程上表现为相对"稳定性"和"变化性"共存;参照性交流和个人情境比较中,参照性交流语言表现出"情境关联性"特征。 The study established the referential communiation situation and individual situation to explore the similar characteristics of language between the two sides in the learning process of referential communication and the comparison with individual situation. The results showed that: There was a significant difference in Jaccard similarity of languages between Stage 1-3, and there was a significant difference between Stage 5 and Stage 6, and the difference was significant between adjacent phases of Stage 8-10. The Jaccard similarity of language in block10 was significantly higher than that of the dimension selection. The results suggested that: The similarity of the language had changed with communication process. In the process of communication, language was characterized by relative stability and variability. In the comparison of referential communication and personal situation, language showed the characteristics of "situational relevance".
作者 张恒超
出处 《心理研究》 2017年第5期40-46,共7页 Psychological Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)
关键词 参照性交流 学习 情境 referential communication learning situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献116

  • 1沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:82
  • 2Araban, S. , Zainalipour, H. , Saadi, R. H. R., Javdan, M. , Sezide, K. , & Sajjadi, S. (2012). Study of cooperative learning effects on self-efficacy and academic achievement in English lesson of high school students. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (9), 8524 - 8526.
  • 3Arnold, ]. E. , Tanenhaus, M. K. , Altmann, R. J. , & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578 -582.
  • 4Bangerter, A. , & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27 (2) , 195 - 225.
  • 5Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391 -418.
  • 6Bezuidenhout, A. (2012). Perspective taking in conversation: A defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics, in press.
  • 7B6gels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., & Chwilla, D. J. (2011). Pitch accents in context: How listeners process accentuation in referential communication. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2022 -2036.
  • 8Branigan, H. P., Pit'kering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13 -B25.
  • 9Brenuan, S. E. , Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A. , Neider, M. B. , & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognitior, 106 (3), 1465 - 1477.
  • 10Brennan, S. E. , & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274 -291.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部