期刊文献+

高校学前教育专业学生尝试开展幼儿园科学教育活动时出现的问题及对策 被引量:3

The Problems Preschool Education Major Students Have in Their Science Education Activities in Kindergartens and Some Suggestions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究依托《幼儿园科学教育》课程教学,对高校学前教育专业学生尝试开展幼儿园科学教育活动的设计与实施情况进行了调查。结果显示:(1)科学活动主题较狭窄,学生对教育内容的理解与把握能力较弱。(2)活动过程控制性较强,学生对幼儿的科学学习规律缺乏认识。(3)教学语言不够科学,学生对科学概念缺乏准确理解。据此,研究者提出:(1)帮助高校学前教育专业学生树立起正确的幼儿园科学教育价值观。(2)提高高校学前教育专业学生的科学素养,丰富其有关学科的科学知识。(3)鼓励高校学前教育专业学生积极参与有关“科学探究”活动。(4)加强理论与实践的联系。 This study did a survey about preschool education major students' ability of designing and implementing science education in kindergartens. The results show (1) the scope of content is narrow, and students' ability of understanding the content is weak; (2) the process of activities is under strong control, and students do not have sufl]cient knowledge about how children learn; and (3) teaching language is not suitable for children, and students do not comprehend accurately those science terms. Some suggestions are provided including helping preschool education major students build the right value on science education for children, improving their subject matter knowledge in science, encouraging them participate those "sci- entific exploration" activities, and enhancing the connection between theory and practice.
作者 高宏钰 Gao Hongyu(College of Preschool Education, Capitol Normal University, Beijing, 100048)
出处 《幼儿教育(教育科学)》 2017年第10期39-41,47,共4页 Early Childhood Education(Educational Sciences)
基金 2015年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“幼儿园教师胜任力发展研究”的研究成果之一,项目批准号:SKZZA2015003
关键词 幼儿园科学教育活动 幼儿园教师 高校学前教育专业学生 science education activities in kindergarten kindergarten teachers preschool education major students in univer- sities
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献17

  • 1National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 2National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 3C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 4John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 5John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 6Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 7John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.
  • 8Jerome Bruner.Process of Education[M].Boston,MA:Harbard University Press,1961.14.
  • 9Hammer. D..et al.Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students Abilities [A].R.Duschl & R.Grandy.Teaching Scientific INquiry [C].Rotterdam,The Netherlands:Sense Publishers,2005.138-156.
  • 10梁玉华.《纲要》颁布10年来幼儿园科学教育内容改革探析[J].幼儿教育(教育科学),2011(9):12-15. 被引量:7

共引文献144

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部