期刊文献+

考虑行李的多格子元胞自动机登机模型 被引量:5

Multi-grid cellular automata boarding model considering carried baggages
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了精确描述旅客登机过程,分析了经典的旅客登机模型,考虑了旅客携带行李占用过道空间与步行速度,刻画了2种新的过道干扰:速度干扰和入座干扰,建立了多格子元胞自动机登机模型,根据旅客携带行李数量,提出了多行李优先登机策略。分析结果表明:当客座率为100%时,新模型登机时间为1 455s,干扰次数为6 720,经典模型登机时间为1 244s,干扰次数为5 412,相比于经典登机模型,新模型模拟了机舱内旅客运动的复杂情况,元胞尺寸增大,旅客间相互作用增强,因此,登机时间较长,过道干扰较大,比较符合实际旅客登机行为;当客座率为100%时,采用多行李优先登机策略的登机时间为1 303s,相比随机登机策略减少了150s,节省登机时间10.3%,过道干扰次数为5 686,相比随机策略减少了808次,因此,采用多行李优先登机策略能有效地减小过道干扰,提高登机效率。 In order to accurately describe passenger boarding process,the classic boarding model was analyzed. The luggage-occupied aisle space and movement speed of passenger were considered,two new aisle interferences were proposed,namely speed interference and entering seat interference,and a multi-grid cellular automata boarding model was built.A multi-baggage priority boarding strategy was proposed according to the numbers of passengers’ baggages.Analysis result shows that when the seat occupancy is 100%,the boarding time and interference number with the new model are 1 455 sand 6 720 times,respectively,while the corresponding values with the classic model are 1 244 sand 5 412 times.Compared with the classic model,in the new model,because the complexity of passenger movement in the cabin is simulated,the cell size and the interaction between passengers increase,so the boarding time is longer,and the aisle interference is larger,which more accords with the actual boarding behavior of passenger.When the seat occupancy is 100%,the multi-baggage priority boarding strategy is compared with the random boarding strategy,the boarding time is 1 303 sand decreases by 150 s,namely10.3%,and the aisle interference number is 5 686 times and reduces 808 times,so the newboarding strategy can effectively reduce the aisle interference and improve the boarding efficiency.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期122-129,共8页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1433111 U1333108)
关键词 航空运输 登机策略 登机模型 多格子元胞自动机 过道干扰 登机效率 air transportation boarding strategy boarding model multi-grid cellular automata model aisle interference boarding efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1David C N, Kathleen L M. A study of the airline boarding problem [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2008, 14(4) : 197 - 204.
  • 2Steffen J H. Optimal boarding method for airline passengers [J]. Journal o fAir Transport Management, 2008, 14(3): 146 - 150.
  • 3Bachmat E, Elkin M. Bounds on the performance of back-to front airplane boarding policies [J]. Operations Research Letters, 2008, 36(5): 597-601.
  • 4Marelli S, Mattocks G, Merry R. The role of computer simulation in reducing airplane turn time [Z/OL]. Aero Magazine, Quarter 1, 1998, http://www. boeing, com/ commercial/aeromagazine.
  • 5Van Landeghem H, Beuselinek A. Reducing passenger boarding time in airplanes: A simulation based approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142: 294 - 308.
  • 6Ferrari P, Nagel K. Robustness of efficient passenger boarding strategies for airplanes [J]. Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1915: 44-54.
  • 7Kirchner A, Klupfel H, Nishinari K, et al. Simulation of competitive egress behavior: Comparison with aircraft evacuation data [J]. PhysicaA, 2003, 324: 689-697.
  • 8Menkes H L, Briel V D, Villalobos J R, et al. America West Airlines develops efficient boarding strategies [J]. Interface, 2005, 35(3): 191-201.
  • 9Bazargan M. A linear programming approach for aircraft boarding strategy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 183(1): 394-411.
  • 10Marelli S, Mattocks G, Merry R. The Role of Computer Simulation in Reducing Airplane Turn Time[M]. Aero Magazine 1, November,2002.

共引文献26

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部