期刊文献+

改良冲管方法预防经PICC输注多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液管路堵塞的效果观察 被引量:4

Improved pipe-washing prevents blockage of PICC for polyenephosphatidy lcholine infusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良冲管方法对预防经PICC输注多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液堵管的效果。方法将2014年4月-2015年3月收治的应用多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液治疗的15例患者作为对照组,将2015年4月-2016年3月收治的应用多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液治疗的18例患者作为改良组。对照组患者采用常规方法冲管,即输液前后予0.9%氯化钠注射液10mL脉冲式冲管;改良组患者应用改良方法冲管,即在常规冲管的基础上,在输注多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液前后加用5%葡萄糖注射液50mL静脉点滴冲管,和5%葡萄糖注射液10mL脉冲式冲管。比较两组患者PICC输液测试是否堵管时的最大滴速及堵管情况。结果改良组末次输注测试是否堵管时的最大滴速高于对照组;改良组患者输液堵管情况少于对照组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论改良冲管方法能有效降低因输注多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液堵管情况的发生。 Objective To discuss the impact of improved pipe-washing on blockage of PICC for infusion of polyene phosphatidylcholine injection(PPI). Methods A total of 15 patients treated with infusion of PPI from April 2014 to March 2015 were chosen as the control group by convenience sampling method, while another 18 patients treated with PPI from April 2015 to March 2016 were selected as the experimental group. In the control group the pipes were washed with 0.9% 10 mL sodium chloride injection before PPI infusion, while in the experimental group improved pipe washing method was applied. We compared the two groups in terms of the maximum number of transfusion drops and rate of unplanned extubation caused by pipe blockage. Results The maximum number of transfusion drops for pipe biockage test in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group(P0.01). The incidence of pipe blockage was smaller than that in the control group(P〈0.01). Conclusion Improved pipe washing method can effectively reduce rate of tube blockage.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2017年第8期16-19,共4页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 PICC 多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液 冲管 PICC polyene phosphatidylcholine injection pipe washing
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献80

  • 1陈小红,骆惠玉,孙陈芬.恶性肿瘤患者应用PICC和CVC置管的临床观察与护理[J].现代护理,2001,7(11):4-5. 被引量:51
  • 2封秀琴,金丁萍,梁皎.应用尿激酶疏通深静脉导管堵塞的护理观察[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(9):709-710. 被引量:82
  • 3刘冰.思美泰与易善复之间存在配伍禁忌[J].解放军护理杂志,2006,23(5):56-56. 被引量:3
  • 4Wright A. Reducing Infusion Failure: A Pharmacologic Approach-A Review[J ]. J Intraven Nurs, 1996, 19(2):89-97.
  • 5赵林芳,沈春苗,朱春芳.更换连接器解决分体式PICC导管堵管的经验[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(9):864-864. 被引量:20
  • 6舒辰慧.物理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:51.
  • 7Richardson D , Bruso P. Vascular access devices :management of common complications [J]. Journal ofIntravenous Nursing, 1993,16 (2) : 44-49.
  • 8Hoffer EK , Borsa J , Santulli P,et al. Prospectiveran[J]mized comparison of valved versus nonvalvedperipherally inserted central vein catheters [ J].American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999,173 (5):1393-1398.
  • 9Abdullah BJ,Mohammad N,Sangkar JV,et al. Incid-ence of upper limb venous thrombosis associated withperipherally inserted central catheters ( PICC )[J]. TheBritish Journal of Radiology,2005,78 (931) : 596-600.
  • 10Gonsalves CF,Eschelman DJ,Sullivan KL,et al. Incid-ence of central vein stenosis and occlusion followingupper extremity PICC and port placement [j] . Cardio-vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2003,26(2):123-127.

共引文献134

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部