期刊文献+

打击跨国毒品犯罪警务合作机制之完善——基于“一带一路”战略背景下的思考 被引量:4

On Improvement of Police Cooperation Mechanism for Cracking down on Cross-border Drug crimes:The "Belt and Road" Background-based Reflection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "一带一路"沿线国家毒品犯罪与恐怖主义合流趋势明显、犯罪主体多元化、手段隐蔽性增强,沿线国家文化差异、常设性机构缺乏、情报共享机制不畅和跨境刑事证据适用难等问题导致目前的警务合作出现困境。必须完善打击跨国毒品犯罪警务合作机制,以经济往来促进政治合作,奠定警务合作基础;建立常设性警务合作机构,加强情报信息共享;尊重各方法律,强化证据互认;控制毒资洗钱犯罪,追缴涉毒资产。 The countries along the line of the "Belt and R o a d11 witness obvious confluent trend of drug-related crimes and terrorism, diversified criminal subjects, heavily concealed crime means, cultural differences, lack of permanent organizations, impeded information sharing mechanism, unsatisfactory cross-border criminal evidence applicability, giving rise to predicaments in current police cooperation. Accordingly, efforts need to be m a d e to improve police cooperation mechanism for cracking d o w n on cross-border drug crimes, promote political coopeation and lay good foundation for police cooperation through economic contact, construct permanent organizations for police cooperation to enhance information sharing, respect laws of all parties and emphasize mutual recognition of evidences, control drug related money laundering actiivities and press for drug-related assets.
机构地区 浙江警察学院
出处 《广西警察学院学报》 2017年第3期92-96,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Police College
关键词 “一带一路” 跨国毒品犯罪 警务合作 the MBelt and Road" cross-border drug crimes police cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献60

  • 1郑永红,李波阳.论西部地区的禁毒情报协作——西部地区毒品犯罪对全国禁毒工作影响研究之二[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2005,17(1):81-84. 被引量:1
  • 2杨健鸿、吕彬.《指控糯康,证据6000页》,《检察日报》2012年11月8日.
  • 3See John R. Spencer, The Problems of Trar~-border Evidence and European Initiatives to Resolve Them, 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 465, 465 (2006-2007).
  • 4杨云骅:《境外取得刑事证据之证据能力判断:以违反国际刑事司法互助原则及境外讯问证人为中心》,载《台大法学论丛》2014年第6期.
  • 5See J. I. M. G. Jahae, P. A. M. Mevis &J. M. Reijntjes et al. , Criminal Evidence Obtained Abroad: how to assess the legality of obtaining it, in C. M. BREUR, M. M. KOMMER & J. F. NIJBOER ET AL. ( EDS. ), NEW TRENDS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND EVIDENCE, VOLUME 2, at 353 (Intersentia, 2000).
  • 6See J. I. M. G. Jahae,P. A. M. Mevis &]. M. Reijntjes et al. , supra note 6, 351.
  • 7See John D. Jackson, The Effect of Human Rights on Criminal Evidentiary Processes: Towards Convergence, 9. Divergence or Realignment .9, 68 (5) Modem Law Review 737, 747--757 ( 2005 ).
  • 8See CHANTAL JOUBERT, JUDICIALCONTROL OF FOREIGN EVIDENCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, at 15-16 (Dutch University Press, 2005).
  • 9M. DELMAS-MARTY & J. A. E. VERVAELE ( EDS. ), THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CORPUS JURIS IN THE MEMBER STATES, VOLUME 1, at 27 ( Antwerpen-Groningen-Oxford, Intersentia, 2010).
  • 10See MIREILLE DELMAS-MARTY & JOHN R. SPENCER (EDS.), EUROPEAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURES, at 122-123 ( Cambridge University Press, 2002).

同被引文献45

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部