期刊文献+

生理学融入基础医学整合课程教学模式的实践与总结 被引量:3

Practice and Summary of Integrating Physiology into Basic Medical Curriculum Integration Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在基础医学课程器官系统整合课程模式中如何有机地融入传统生理学课程的教学内容。方法以器官系统整合课程模式设置课改班,与常规班比较,观察评价的指标主要有教师对PBL的评价、学生基础医学七科联考成绩、学生问卷调查结果等。结果教师对学生PBL评价在"发言的针对性"和"提高综合能力"两方面评价有统计意义(P<0.05);课改班基础医学七科联考成绩差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。结论基础医学课程器官系统整合课程模式有利于提升学生知识的应用和分析解决问题的能力,也能提高学生学习生理学的学习兴趣,但对于应试能力的培养效果不明显。 Objective To investigate how to be more reasonable to arrange teaching content of traditional physiology course in organ-system based basic medical curriculum integration mode. Methods We compared experimental class which adopting organ-system based curriculum integration mode with conventional class. Main evaluation index included teachers' evaluation on PBL,students' scores in seven subjects examination for basic medicine,and the results of student questionnaire,etc. Results In teachers' evaluation on PBL,two aspects evaluation of"Pertinence of speech" and the"Improve comprehensive ability"had statistical significance(P0.05);Examination results of seven subjects had no statistically significant difference(P0.05)in experimental class. Conclusions Organ-system based basic medical curriculum integration mode is helpful to improve students' ability to analyze and solve problems,and application of knowledge ability,and it can also enhance the students' interest in learning physiology.However,its effect on obtaining examination skills is not obvious.
机构地区 海南医学院
出处 《高校医学教学研究(电子版)》 2017年第3期45-49,共5页 Medicine Teaching in University (Electronic Edition)
基金 海南医学院2013校级专项课题(HYZX201302)
关键词 生理学 基础医学 整合课程 器官系统 Physiology,Basic medicine,Curriculum integration,Organ-system
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1顾鸣敏,黄钢.中美英医学院校医学课程整合的比较与分析[J].医学与哲学(A),2009,30(5):68-69. 被引量:74
  • 2易露茜,陶立坚,陈启元.高等医学教育计划改革浅析[J].中国高等医学教育,2005(3):27-28. 被引量:33
  • 3Ko M, Edelstein RA, Heslin Ke, et al.Impact.of the University of California, Los Angeles/Charles R. Drew University Medical Education on medical students' intentions to practice in underserved areas [J].Acad Med, 2005 sep; 80(9) :803 - 8.
  • 4illcerson L, Korin TL, Lee M, et al. University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA[J]. Acad Med, 2004 Jul; 79(7 suppl) :s17 - 20.
  • 5LuAnn Wilkerson, Paul Wimmers, Lawrence H. Doyle, et al. Two Perspectives on the Effects of a Curriculum Change: Student Experience and the United States Medical Licensing Examination, Step 1 [J]. Acad Med, 2007 Oct; 82(10 suppl) :s117 - 120.
  • 6[2]Moore GT,Block SD,Style CB,Mitchell R.The influence of the New Pathway curriculum on Harvard medical students[J].Acad Med,1994,69(12):983-989.
  • 7[3]Peters AS,Greenberger-Rosovsky R,Crowder C,Block SD,Moore GT.Long-term outcomes of the New Pathway Program at Harvard Medical School:a randomized controlled trial[J].Acad Med,2000,75(5):470-479.
  • 8[4]Harvard Medical School.哈佛医学院网页[EB/OL].[2007-05-09].http://www.harvard.edu.
  • 9[5]Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.霍普金斯大学医学院网页[EB/OL].[2007-03-02].http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org.
  • 10[6]Goldberg HR,Dintzis R.The positive impact of team-based virtual microscopy on student learning in physiology and histology[J].Adv Physiol Edue,2007,31:261-265.

共引文献169

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部