摘要
清儒阮元撰《宋本十三经注疏挍勘记》,其《春秋谷梁传注疏挍勘记》所言,与明监本《春秋谷梁传注疏》存在若干矛盾之处。阮元所引据的明监本《春秋谷梁传注疏》,非原刻之明监本,而是重修明监本。考定阮元《春秋谷梁传注疏挍勘记》所据乃是重修明监本,具有四点意义。其一,深化对《春秋谷梁传注疏挍勘记》的认识;其二,比较明监本、重修明监本《春秋谷梁传注疏》版本之优劣;其三,提高今后点校本《十三经注疏·春秋谷梁传注疏》的整理本水平;其四,为认识《宋本十三经注疏挍勘记》所引据的"明监本"提供思路。
Ruan Yuan of Qing dynasty worte Song Ben Shi San Jing Zhu Shu Jiao Kan Ji, which had so many conflicts with Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu of Ming dynasty. Ruan quated from Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu, it was a revison, instead of copying. To confirm Ruan Yuan’s Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu Jiao Kan Ji quated from revision has four significances. First, to deepen the understanding of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu Jiao Kan Ji; secondly, to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the revision and copying of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu; thirdly, to improve the future research level of Shi San Jing Zhu Shu -Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Zhu Shu; fourth, to provide ideas for understanding of “Ming Jian Ben” Song Ben Shi San Jing Zhu Shu Jiao Kan Ji quoted from.
出处
《职大学报》
2017年第5期43-47,共5页
Journal of the Staff and Worker’s University