期刊文献+

我国检察官豁免权研究 被引量:1

Study on the immunity of prosecutors in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国的检察官豁免权虽然受到学界的忽视,但其事实上是检察官身份保障制度的重要一环。我国的检察官豁免权由民事责任豁免权和司法责任豁免权构成,其中民事责任豁免权保障了检察官的办案积极性,而司法责任豁免权则保障了检察官的办案独立性。我国应当将检察官豁免权的概念在法律中明确,并完善相应的豁免权行使机制,以更好地保障检察官的权益。 Although the immunity of prosecutors in China is neglected by academics,it is in fact an important part of the identity protection system of the prosecutor.The immunity of the procurator in China is made up of the immunity of civil liability and the immunity of judicial liability.The immunity of civil liability protects the enthusiasm of the prosecutor,while the immunity of judicial liability protects the independence of the prosecutor.The concept of the immunity of the prosecutor should be clarified in the law and the corresponding immunity exercise mechanism improved to better protect the rights and interests of the prosecutors.
作者 刘栩
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》 2017年第5期39-43,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词 检察官 豁免权 身份保障 司法责任 prosecutors immunity identity protection judicial responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1胡国平.美国检察官及其自由裁量权[J].人民检察,2003(1):58-60. 被引量:5
  • 2蓝向东.美国检察官的民事责任豁免权[J].中国检察官,2006(9):63-65. 被引量:6
  • 3Imbler v. Pachtman. 424 U. S. 409 . 1976
  • 4Harlow v.Fitzgerald. 457U.S.800 . 1982
  • 5Kalina v.Fletcher. 522 U.S.118 . 1997
  • 6Anderson v.Creighton. 483 U.S.635 . 1987
  • 7Sirros v Moore and Others. QB 118 . 1975
  • 8J.TRAVIS.Rethinking Sovereign Immunity after Bivens. New York University Law Review . 1982
  • 9Butz v.Economou. 438 U.S.478 . 1978
  • 10Carlson v.Green. 446 U.S.14 . 1980

共引文献8

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部