摘要
对中国的崛起,国内外都存在着民族主义解读。由于中国是以马克思主义为指导的国家,必须对这种解读予以合理的解释,否则就会产生正当性问题。从总体上说,马克思恩格斯是持"无产阶级国际主义"立场而否定民族主义的,但是,他们并未完全把民族主义作为落后的概念来使用,他们对中华民族在鸦片战争中的道义立场是肯定的。列宁在帝国主义与无产阶级革命时代发展了马克思主义的民族问题理论,肯定了被压迫民族的解放与无产阶级革命之关联。民族危机是马克思主义进入中国的驱动机制,中华民族复兴事业开辟了马克思主义的新境界。
The rise of China has been interpreted both at home and abroad to have a nationalist tendency.As a state guided by Marxism,it is necessary for China to provide a rational response towards such interpretation,so as to avoid legitimacy problem.Generally speaking,Marx and Engels’position of'proletarian internationalism'oppose nationalism.However,instead of taking nationalism as something purely backward,they actually affirm the moral position of the Chinese nation during the Opium War.Lenin further developed the Marxist theory on national issues in the era of imperialism and proletarian revolution,and affirmed the connection between the liberation of the oppressed nations and the proletarian revolution.The national crisis was the driving mechanism of Marx’s entry into China,and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation has brought about new development of Marxism.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第9期5-13,72,共10页
Studies on Marxism