期刊文献+

基于病案首页数据的剖宫产主要手术指征分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Major Surgical Indications of Cesarean Section Based on the Homepage of the Medical Records
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性调查某医院近两年剖宫产率及手术指征构成的变化。方法从某院病案首页信息管理系统中检索2015年-2016年住院期间进行剖宫产和顺产的所有产妇的病案首页数据进行分析核查。结果 2015年与2016年剖宫产率分别为46.89%和51.01%,2016年剖宫产率高于2015年;剖宫产主要手术指征顺位排序前四位为"妊娠合并子宫瘢痕"、"脐带问题"、"胎儿先露异常"和"母体骨盆或盆腔器官异常";其中2016年"妊娠合并子宫瘢痕"所占的比例高于2015年,"脐带问题"与"母体骨盆或盆腔器官异常"这两种手术指征所占的比例低于2015年,而不同年份的"胎儿先露异常"的指征所占的比例没有显著差异;在以"妊娠合并子宫瘢痕"为主要手术指征的剖宫产组和具有"妊娠合并子宫瘢痕"的顺产组的产妇中,剖宫产组的年龄高于顺产组;相较于省内产妇,省外产妇更倾向于顺产;多胎产妇剖宫产的比例高于单胎产妇,但两组产妇的妊娠伴随症、妊娠并发症以及怀有巨大儿的比例均没有差异。结论 2016年剖宫产率升高与"妊娠合并子宫瘢痕"手术指征有关,为合理选择分娩方式,降低剖宫产率,医师应对具有剖宫产史的产妇进行严格的监测,避免剖宫产手术指征的滥用。 Objective To investigate the changes of cesarean section rate and surgical indications of a hospital in the past two years. Methods Analyse the homepage of the medical records of maternal with cesarean section and natural birth from 2015 to 2016 in the hospital information management system. Results The rate of cesarean section in 2015 and 2016 were respectively 46.89% and 51.01%. The rate of cesarean section in 2016 was higher than 2015. The top four main surgical indications of cesarean section were "pregnancy with uterine scar", "umbilical cord problems", "fetal first exposed abnormalities" and "maternal pelvic or pelvic organ abnormalities"; The proportion of "pregnancy with uterine scar" in 2016 was higher than 2015, and the proportion of "Umbilical cord problem" and "maternal pelvic or pelvic organ abnormalities" were lower than 2015, But there was no significant difference in the proportion of "prenatal abnormalities" in different years. In the comparison of the cesarean section group with "pregnancy combined with uterine scar" as the main surgical indication and the natural birth group with the "pregnancy with uterine scar", the age of the cesarean section group was higher than natural birth group.Compared to the province of maternal, outside were more inclined to go for the natural birth. The rate of cesarean section in multiple birth women was higher than the singleton pregnant women. But there were no differences in pregnancy symptoms, pregnancy complications, and macrosomia between the two groups. Conclusion The increase of cesarean section in 2016 was related to the indication of "pregnancy with uterine scar". For a reasonable choice of delivery mode, reducing the rate of cesarean section, doctors should have strict monitor to maternal cesarean section,avoid the abuse of cesarean section indications.
出处 《中国病案》 2017年第10期67-70,共4页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 妊娠合并子宫瘢痕 剖宫产 剖宫产率 手术指征 Pregnancy with uterine scar Cesarean section Cesarean section rate Surgical Indications
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

  • 1魏琼,李立.不同年代剖宫产手术指征变迁的因数分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(20):264-265. 被引量:2
  • 2曾丽萍.疤痕子宫的阴道试产[J].江西医学院学报,2004,44(3):44-44. 被引量:31
  • 3汪炼.剖宫产率上升与围产儿病死率的关系[J].实用妇产科杂志,1995,11(4):201-202. 被引量:70
  • 4汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 5Walker R, Turnbu11 D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence[J]. Birth, 2002,29:28-39.
  • 6Betrdn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates[l]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21:98-113.
  • 7C6ceres IA, Arcaya M, Declercq E, et al. Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US)2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8:e57817.
  • 8Blumenthal NJ, Harris RS, O'Connor MC,et al. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1984, 24: 246-251.
  • 9Long Q, Klemetti R, Wang Y, et al. High Caesarean section rate in rural China: is it related to health insurance (New Co- operative Medical Scheme)? [J]. Soc Sei Med, 2012, 75:733- 737.
  • 10Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, et al. Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999[J]. Birth, 2001,28:166-172.

共引文献542

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部