期刊文献+

自动血细胞分析参数对骨髓增生异常综合征和再生障碍性贫血的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:7

Performance of Automatic Blood Cell Analysis Parameters for Differential Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Aplastic Anemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨自动血细胞分析参数对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和再生障碍性贫血(AA)的鉴别诊断价值。方法收集北京大学深圳医院2002年12月~2011年2月确诊为MDS或AA患者的病案资料,对符合纳入标准的病例诊断当次检查的自动血细胞分析参数资料进行统计学分析,找出差异有统计学意义的血细胞分析参数,并以ROC曲线评价这些指标对MDS和AA的鉴别诊断价值。结果 33例MDS和36例AA患者被纳入研究。根据可供评估的资料,MDS患者组与AA患者组比较,平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)(328.58±17.24 g/L vs 342.47±18.75 g/L,n=33/36)显著减低(P=0.002 1),而单核细胞百分比(MONO%)(11.48±9.99 vs 6.94±2.50,n=32/34)、血小板分布宽度(PDW%)(13.51±4.24 vs 10.62±3.68,n=20/22)和血小板比容(PCT%)(0.11±0.10 vs 0.04±0.07,n=11/15)显著增高(P值分别为0.0202,0.0231和0.0356),其余指标两者比较差异无统计学意义。在最适cut-off值条件下,以上四个指标鉴别诊断MDS和AA的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.706(95%可信区间:0.584~0.809),0.666(0.540~0.778),0.668(0.506~0.805)和0.745(0.538~0.894);MONO%和MCHC对鉴别诊断MDS和AA有较高的特异度和阳性预测值,分别为97.06%,88.89%和93.3%,80.0%。结论 MONO%和MCHC可作为鉴别诊断MDS和AA的简单易行指标。 Objective To evaluate the performance of automated blood ceil analysis parameters for differential diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and aplastic anemia (AA). Methods Data of automatic blood cell analysis parameters at diagnosis of confirmed patients with MDS and AA from December 2002 to February 2011 in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Results 33 cases of MDS and 36 cases of AA were recruited in this study. Based on the evaluable data, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (328.58 - 17.24 g/L vs 342.47 ± 18.75 g/L, n 33/36) was significantly lower (P=0. 002 1) ,while monocyte percentage (MONO%)(11. 48±9.99 vs 6.94±2.50,n=32/ 34) ,platelet distribution width (PDW%)(13.51±4.24 vs 10.62±3.68,n=20/22) and platelet hematocrit (PCT%)(0. 11 ±0. 10 vs 0. 04±0. 07,n=11/15) were markedly higer (all P〈0.05) in patients with MDS than that of AA. No significantly differences for other blood cell analysis parameters were seen between patients with MDS and AA. Under the condition of best cut off value,areas under the ROC curve of MCHC,MONO% ,PDW and PCT were 0. 706 (95% confidence in- terval:0. 584±0. 809),0. 666 (0. 540±0. 778),0. 668 (0. 506±0. 805) and 0. 745 (0. 538±0. 894) respectively. MONO% and MCHC had high specificities (97. 06% and 88.89% ) and positive predictive values (93.3% and 80.0% ) for differential diagnosis of MDS from AA. Conclusion MONO% and MCHC may be used as simple indicators for differential diagnosis of MDS and AA.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第5期74-77,82,共5页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
基金 深圳市科技创新委基础研究资助项目(JCYJ20150403091443282)
关键词 骨髓增生异常综合征 再生障碍性贫血 自动血细胞分析参数 鉴别诊断 myelodysplastic syndromes aplastic anemia automatic blood cell analysis differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献5

  • 1Swerdlow SH,Campo E,Harris NL,et al.WHO Cla-ssification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues[M].France:Lyon IARC Press,2008:88.
  • 2Valent P,Horny HP,Bennett JM,et al.Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes:Consensus statements and report from a working conference[J].Leuk Res,2007,31(6):727-736.
  • 3Marsh JC,Ball SE,Cavenagh J,et al.Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aplastic anaemia[J].Br J Haemato,2009,147(1):43-70.
  • 4Matsui WH,Brodsky RA,Smith BD,et al.Quantitative analysis of bone marrow CD34 cells in aplastic anemia and hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes[J].Leukemia,2006,20(3):458-462.
  • 5Gupta V,Brooker C,Tooze JA,et al.Clinical relevance of cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis of acquired aplastic anaemia in adults[J].Br J Haemato,2006,134(1):95-99.

共引文献469

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部